> Is this the sign of Global Warming?

Is this the sign of Global Warming?

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
A theory that cannot be falsified is not a valid theory and that's what we have with the man-made Global Warming theory.

Alarmists blame EVERYTHING on man-made Global Warming. Thus it's a politically motivated agenda, not a valid scientific theory. Alarmists tell us that EVERYTHING bad is caused by man-made Global Warming. You say you don't believe me? Let me help you.

The site I've linked below claims to have the complete list of bad things that have allegedly been caused by Global Warming. http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.ht...

For example: Did you know that Global Warming killed the Loch Ness Monster? (sad hun? - no word on Godzilla) http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scotti...

How about the poor polar bears who's penis sizes are shrinking because of Global Warming (pollution). I wonder how many researchers they lost getting those measurements. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14485634/

Global Warming is said to be hurting the brothel industry. http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/39945-globa...

But on a serious note, this shows how utterly fraudulent and out of control the Global Warming farrago has always been. The reason for all of this nonsense is because if researchers could somehow link their research to Global Warming --- they got money.

The Warmists have bought all the propaganda with our taxpayer dollars. And that's why for a couple of decades every other news story you read had something to do with Global Warming and the new horror it caused. Most people don't realize this scam has been limping along for more than 30 years already. And that's what's truly sad --- such a waste of taxpayer money to prop-up this globalist hoax. But they are not after only our money, they want to destroy our freedoms too.

-----------------------

Not necessarily. A change is when, on average, it always changes. A single change can be random.

E.g., here in Dawson City, we bet on when the Yukon River will break up. It varies from year to year, from 28 April to 3 June. So, a breakup of 29 April is not from Climate Change. However, the fact that the average day is now 1 week earlier than it was in 1898, and it's been a steady change, is. We see many examples of Climate Change, e.g., 10,000 year old Permafrost melting, and so on. But it is trends you have to look at, not single events.

Some say that because of waning solar activity, this will be the norm for the next 30yrs, I hope not this would be really bad for us.

Cold weather consistantly would be damaging for agriculture and the economy, not to mention health.

yes

http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/wyoming-colorado-exceptional-cold-nuri/37351786?

Quote from the article, "This is exceptional cold," AccuWeather.com Senior Meteorologist Henry Margusity said. "It's the coldest air we've seen in decades during November

I am reposting this question because I would like to see Maxx's response to CR's lame name calling. (Which is against community guidelines.)