> Find me evidence that global warming is a myth?

Find me evidence that global warming is a myth?

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
"consensus" means nothing. Lets look at past examples of scientific consensus. The world was made of earth, fire, air, and water. The earth was flat, and you would fall off if you went too far out on the ocean. The sun revolved around the earth. One could not go more than 60 mph without their lungs exploding. Ether existed to propagate light through a void (still not disproved - btw) Diseases could be best cured by bleeding, either with cuts or through the use of leeches. The earth was experiencing global cooling. Moon was made of cheese. Man will never fly.

Finally, my favorite (and historically accurate belief,) witches were burned because they were made of wood - how? because witches weigh more than ducks, and ducks float, as does wood. Therefore, because wood floats, and witches weighed more than ducks which float like wood, witches were made of wood. tah-dah!

Can't be done. Global warming is a fact

Of course global warming exists. So does global cooling. In the end, global cooling will win out because chemistry is not subject to politics; discussion of global warming is.

Anthropogenic global warming may be true. It must first explain the non-anthropogenic concurrent warming of Mars and Jupiter. Until then, it is not a myth, simply unproven.

Rising streams, hotter summaries.

it is a myth because when globe (which is what global means FYI) warms up in the northern helosphere in the summer, it cools down in the southern hem and that is a normal. Then there is clobal cooling during winter while globe warms up in the southern hemo.... but globe does not just warm and warm up. it cools too. sometimes it cools more then it warms and sometimes it warms more than it cools. we are not in more of a warming stage. Also the globe has been very hot during its early days when it was hit by large dinosaur exterminating meteorides raising hella fire and hella warming on this planet earth and killing every living being on it. then it cooled then it will warm up again so that is normal. that is part of how universe is designed and using your time on figuring these things out is a waste of time. did it get warmer? go to the beach. cooler? go skiing. enjoy your time on this planet earth while you can. change yoruself and the earth will chage as well.

Way to go Julie - great satire!!!!

The flat world scientific consensus nonsense is now modified by creationist nutters to an even sillier story - there was scientific consensus for a flat earth until Columbus , inspired by the Bible, sailed to the Americas , proving the world round.

EDIT : Maxx & ramkumar had large parts of their answers identical - word for word.

what an amazing coincidence

The most far-reaching explanation is here:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

Then there is the real science:

U.S. National Academy of Sciences, 2010:

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record...

“Climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for a broad range of human and natural systems.”

http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpine...

“Choices made now about carbon dioxide emissions reductions will affect climate change impacts experienced not just over the next few decades but also in coming centuries and millennia…Because CO2 in the atmosphere is long lived, it can effectively lock the Earth and future generations into a range of impacts, some of which could become very severe.”

http://www.physics.fsu.edu/awards/NAS/

“The Academy membership is composed of approximately 2,100 members and 380 foreign associates, of whom nearly 200 have won Nobel Prizes. Members and foreign associates of the Academy are elected in recognition of their distinguished and continuing achievements in original research; election to the Academy is considered one of the highest honors that can be accorded a scientist or engineer.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_...

http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/...

http://www.aip.org/history/climate/timel...

http://www.aip.org/history/climate/index...

http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument...

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=8...

Here are some of my favorites but there are many more.

You should not believe in man-made Global Warming because it's advocates have no empirical science to back their claim. And their advocacy movement has been mired in scandal since its beginning. Here are some things you should know:

1) The Earth has been both much warmer and much colder in the distant past, long before the industrial age. Climate is indeed changing, but it has always changed and probably always will. These are obviously natural cycles that man does not and cannot control.

2) Global Warming alarmists have been caught in one lie after another. Huge scandals have been continuously revealed since the early 1980’s when the campaign began. Some of these are listed below:

3) Al Gore’s movie "An Inconvenient Truth" was full of bald faced lies. Like the Polar Bears were drowning, or the Ice Caps were melting, or the oceans were rising --- all lies. In fact a court of England ruled the movie was so flawed that it could not be shown to school children without a disclaimer.

4) The Climate Gate affair exposed the utter corruption of the Warmist community with their exposed emails speaking of how they intended to “hide the decline” and how to manipulate data and the peer-review process in their favor.

Ha! Ha! Climate Realist trots out this well worn out and debunked 'ten hottest years' crap. It shows the greenies are so bankrupt, scientifically, that they have nothing but worthless totally debunked junk to peddle on this site. Ha! Ha! CR. When will you finally wake up! That has been debunked so bad that even Jeff M and his puppets won't use it any more. I think the Dork still uses it. Doesn't that tell you something?

Direct answer to your question. Mother Earth herself.

http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut...

This official chart shows that the earth has been cooling for over a decade. Yet the CO2 level has increased during this same time. Do you really need more?

1. Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented rate.

Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures. Average ground station readings do show a mild warming of 0.6 to 0.8Cover the last 100 years, which is well within the natural variations recorded in the last millennium. The ground station network suffers from an uneven distribution across the globe; the stations are preferentially located in growing urban and industrial areas ("heat islands"), which show substantially higher readings than adjacent rural areas ("land use effects").

2. The "hockey stick" graph proves that the earth has experienced a steady, very gradual temperature increase for 1000 years, then recently began a sudden increase.

FACT: Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time. For instance, the Medieval Warm Period, from around 1000 to1200 AD (when the Vikings farmed on Greenland) was followed by a period known as the Little Ice Age. Since the end of the 17th Century the "average global temperature" has been rising at the low steady rate mentioned above; although from 1940 – 1970 temperatures actually dropped, leading to a Global Cooling scare.

The "hockey stick", a poster boy of both the UN's IPCC and Canada's Environment Department, ignores historical recorded climatic swings, and has now also been proven to be flawed and statistically unreliable as well. It is a computer construct and a faulty one at that.

3. Human produced carbon dioxide has increased over the last 100 years, adding to the Greenhouse effect, thus warming the earth.

FACT: Carbon dioxide levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout geologic time. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased. The RATE of growth during this period has also increased from about 0.2% per year to the present rate of about 0.4% per year,which growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years. However, there is no proof that CO2 is the main driver of global warming. As measured in ice cores dated over many thousands of years, CO2 levels move up and down AFTER the temperature has done so, and thus are the RESULT OF, NOT THE CAUSE of warming. Geological field work in recent sediments confirms this causal relationship. There is solid evidence that, as temperatures move up and down naturally and cyclically through solar radiation, orbital and galactic influences, the warming surface layers of the earth's oceans expel more CO2 as a result.

4. CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas.

FACT: Greenhouse gases form about 3 % of the atmosphere by volume. They consist of varying amounts, (about 97%) of water vapour and clouds, with the remainder being gases like CO2, CH4, Ozone and N2O, of which carbon dioxide is the largest amount. Hence, CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere. While the minor gases are more effective as "greenhouse agents" than water vapour and clouds, the latter are overwhelming the effect by their sheer volume and – in the end – are thought to be responsible for 60% of the "Greenhouse effect".

Those attributing climate change to CO2 rarely mention this important fact.

Ignore the claims by denialists. There is no evidence that global warming is a myth. All the evidence is that global warming is happening

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010...

And we are causing it

http://c1planetsavecom.wpengine.netdna-c...

The ten warmest years in the instrumental record are 2010, 2005, 2009, 2007, 2002, 1998, 2006, 2003, 2011 and 2012.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/

Sagebrush



Debunked? By whom? Blogs and videos of graphs attached to see-saws do not count. Only a scientist can debunk the GISS dataset in a peer reviewed article. But if you can't provide real evidence, claim that you can anyways.

complicated situation research over google or bing that might help

You can't prove a negative.

Why?

You're just going to ignore it and then choose a best answer that insults people that don't believe as you do, and that mirrors your own opinions.

I'll just take my two points and move along.

Do you see how expensive 'green' products and appliances are? And most don't work.

I don't know what to believe, but I do know that I'd sooner stop driving than buy a shitty car, and my friend had a 'green' washer dryer, and the clothes were very hard out of the wash, and they smelled like, get this, they smelled like cat piss! Then the company recalled the appliances because they found out that you'd have to dilute one cap full of this crap 'green' detergent, with roughly an olympic swimming pool for it to be safe for fish and the environment.

http://tallbloke.files.wordpress.com/201...

Here are some of my favorites but there are many more.

You should not believe in man-made Global Warming because it's advocates have no empirical science to back their claim. And their advocacy movement has been mired in scandal since its beginning. Here are some things you should know:

1) The Earth has been both much warmer and much colder in the distant past, long before the industrial age. Climate is indeed changing, but it has always changed and probably always will. These are obviously natural cycles that man does not and cannot control.

2) Global Warming alarmists have been caught in one lie after another. Huge scandals have been continuously revealed since the early 1980’s when the campaign began. Some of these are listed below:

3) Al Gore’s movie "An Inconvenient Truth" was full of bald faced lies. Like the Polar Bears were drowning, or the Ice Caps were melting, or the oceans were rising --- all lies. In fact a court of England ruled the movie was so flawed that it could not be shown to school children without a disclaimer.

4) The ClimateGate affair exposed the utter corruption of the Warmist community with their exposed emails speaking of how they intended to “hide the decline” and how to manipulate data and the peer-review process in their favor.

5) Then there is the fact that the globe isn’t even warming anymore and the small amount of warming experienced from the 1900’s to 2013 timeframe was negligible and well within the envelope of normal.

6) During this same period of marginal warming, scientists also noticed that other planets in our solar system were warming. What do these planets have in common ? --- the Sun.

7) Phil Jones, head of the Climatic Research Unit, the Guru and High Priest of Global Warming himself admitted there has been no statistically significant warming. If anyone on the planet would have been aware of statistically significant warming it would have been Phil Jones and he admitted there has been none. (Game Over)

8) Warmists like Al Gore refuse to engage in any formal debate on the issue. That’s because on the few occasions Warmist have debated openly, they lose, and they lose big. Lord Monckton utterly destroys them time and time again.

9) Al Gore and other Warmists have stated clearly that they want to make CO2 the object of a global tax. CO2 is the perfect object for their revenue purposes because you literally cannot live without making CO2, after all, we exhale it. And current science has shown clearly that there is no correlation between the planet’s mean temperature and the concentration of CO2 in the air. Demonizing CO2 is all about the tax dollars, and that’s all its about.

See the scam for what it is and don’t believe any of it.

Polar Bears are doing fine:

http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/190805/2...

Phil Jones admits NO statistically significant warming

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/02/1...

35 major errors in Al Gore’s movie

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckt...

Court rules Al Gore’s movie unfit without disclaimer (11 major errors reviewed)

http://creation.com/al-gores-inconvenien...

Graphs showing that CO2 does NOT drive Temperature

http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/...

Warming on Mars -- and Jupiter, Pluto, Neptune

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?ne...

Lord Monckton destroys Warmist in debate (Video)

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andre...

For the full story on the man-made Global Warming scam watch these:

The Great Global Warming Swindle



dont know get question

it was cold yesterday