I can name a few:
pegminer - Y/A climate science hack
Jeff M - Y/A climate science hack
Climate Unrealist - wannabe Y/A climate science hack
Chem Flunky - a shape-shifting/climate controlling alien theorist here at Y/A
Trevor - a seemingly intelligent Y/A climate science hack
Big Gryph - a total hack
Baccheus - a Y/A climate science hack follower
Jungle Jim - a Y/A climate science wannabe
Hey Dook - a wannabe anything/hide my question hack
antarcticice - a brain-froze Y/A climate science hack
There's 10 of them. ... and they are all here at Y/A. Maybe this is where they all are?
I believe the 97% is based on surveys of published papers, not scientists per se. The latest survey of published papers I can find lists all the papers studied and their positions.
http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/...
All those that endorse AGW are giving a score of 1 to 3 (the last number in each reference line). There are over 12,000 papers listed so I am sure you can manage to find 75 references to look up further from there (if you can bothered of the papers that look at effect or have a position, about 65%, then 97% of them should endorse AGW).
You might have a point, *if* the one study you are aware of were the *only* study that got similar results. But, to my knowledge, there have been a number of studies, with different groups, and among climate scientists none of the studies showed less than 90% acceptance of AGW within the past, oh, 25 years.
There is legitimate scientific debate about how much it will warm, what effects it will have, what feedbacks will be triggered, and so on. But virtually no one who actually knows anything about climate rejects the basic ideas that 1. it is warming, 2. the warming is primarily due to human carbon emissions (and other greenhouse gas emissions), and 3. the warming is likely to cause at least some problems.
Doctor who?
Try "asking" the "question" once again
a) in grammatically correct English
b) with some source / logic / explained fantasy about the alleged "75 scientists"
(Any (honest) ignoramus knows that over a THOUSAND scientists contribute to the IPCC reports, and many others also work in climate science, without directly contributing).
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ar5/ar5_authors_r...
https://www.ipcc-wg1.unibe.ch/
http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg3/i...
c) first counteracting your extreme lack of knowledge with a few basic facts about the science you've been rotely denying, starting with the MASSIVE research that occurred long before the IPCC was even created in the late 1980s:
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/timel...
1824
Fourier calculates that the Earth would be far colder if it lacked an atmosphere. =>Simple models
1859
Tyndall discovers that some gases block infrared radiation. He suggests that changes in the concentration of the gases could bring climate change. =>Other gases
1896
Arrhenius publishes first calculation of global warming from human emissions of CO2. =>Simple models
1930s
Global warming trend since late 19th century reported. =>Modern temp's
Milankovitch proposes orbital changes as the cause of ice ages. =>Climate cycles
1938
Callendar argues that CO2 greenhouse global warming is underway, reviving interest in the question. =>CO2 greenhouse
1956
Plass calculates that adding CO2 to the atmosphere will have a significant effect on the radiation balance. =>Radiation math
1957
Revelle finds that CO2 produced by humans will not be readily absorbed by the oceans. =>CO2 greenhouse
1958
Telescope studies show a greenhouse effect raises temperature of the atmosphere of Venus far above the boiling point of water. =>Venus & Mars
1960
Keeling accurately measures CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere and detects an annual rise. =>CO2 greenhouse The level is 315 ppm. Mean global temperature (five-year average) is 13.9°C.
1963
Calculations suggest that feedback with water vapor could make the climate acutely sensitive to changes in CO2 level. =>Radiation math
1965
Boulder, Colo. meeting on causes of climate change: Lorenz and others point out the chaotic nature of climate system and the possibility of sudden shifts. =>Chaos theory
1966
Emiliani's analysis of deep-sea cores and Broecker's analysis of ancient corals show that the timing of ice ages was set by small orbital shifts, suggesting that the climate system is sensitive to small changes. =>Climate cycles
1967
International Global Atmospheric Research Program established, mainly to gather data for better short-range weather prediction, but including climate. =>International
Manabe and Wetherald make a convincing calculation that doubling CO2 would raise world temperatures a couple of degrees. =>Radiation math
1968
Studies suggest a possibility of collapse of Antarctic ice sheets, which would raise sea levels catastrophically. =>Sea rise & ice
1969
Nimbus III satellite begins to provide comprehensive global atmospheric temperature measurements. =>Government
1971
SMIC conference of leading scientists reports a danger of rapid and serious global change caused by humans, calls for an organized research effort. =>International
1972
Ice cores and other evidence show big climate shifts in the past between relatively stable modes in the space of a thousand years or so, especially around 11,000 years ago. =>Rapid change
1976
Studies show that CFCs (1975) and also methane and ozone (1976) can make a serious contribution to the greenhouse effect. =>Other gases
Deep-sea cores show a dominating influence from 100,000-year Milankovitch orbital changes, emphasizing the role of feedbacks. =>Climate cycles
Deforestation and other ecosystem changes are recognized as major factors in the future of the climate. =>Biosphere
1979
World Climate Research Programme launched to coordinate international research. =>International
1982
Strong global warming since mid-1970s is reported, with 1981 the warmest year on record. =>Modern temp's
1985
Antarctic ice cores show that CO2 and temperature went up and down together through past ice ages, pointing to powerful biological and geochemical feedbacks. =>CO2
1988
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is established. =>International
1989
Fossil-fuel and other U.S. industries form Global Climate Coalition to tell politicians and the public that climate science is too uncertain to justify action. =>Public opinion
1990
First IPCC report says world has been warming and future warming seems likely. =>International
Surveys like that are usually anonymous.
This statement is nonsense...and it is impossible to answer the question.
I have asked this question before and no one did. Let us try again.
