>> Do you agree with the consensus of Russian Scientiysts?<<
Here is the official statement on Global Warming by the Russian Academy of Science (which includes the Pulkovo Observatory):
http://nationalacademies.org/onpi/060720...
And – here is what Yuri Nagovitsyn actually said:
“The period of low solar activity could start in 2030-2040 but it won’t be as pervasive as in the late 17th century".
“I want to stress that this theory is neither the official theory of the Pulkovo observatory nor of the Commission on Climate Changes Studies at St. Petersburg Research Center."
http://voiceofrussia.com/2012_02_21/6656...
Whatever the reason is that you feel compelled to constantly prove yourself and all Deniers to be liars, it is really not necessary – as it already is well known.
The Russians have disagreed about global warming for decades. The only reason they signed up to Kyoto is because they saw a way to make money. I suspect that all of their scientific statements are coordinated to time with international gatherings. They make noises about global cooling every time they want to get a concession from the other attendees, who are desperate for their acquiescence.
Kyoto was especially profitable as it contained a provision that countries responsible for X% of total CO2 emissions had to sign up for the treaty to go into effect, and with the US absent, Russia was needed to meet the threshold.
check out this website for information about climate science if You really want to know.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-c...
and also http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-w...
You can't declare a trend of "cooling" unless its been happening for more than 30 years. Just think about how old the earth is: 4.5 billion years old. And the previous events of climate change which have occurred (e.g. ice Age, cretaceous period) happened VERY SLOWLY over thousands of years!! And Humans have really only been here making a mess (like actually impacting the earth) for the last 400-600 years! Our climate is changing to much faster than it has in the past, and it is caused by humans. We've only been studying the climate for the last 150 years at most. We can't predict long term trends from less than 10 years observations. That's not accurate science.
1. It is not a concensus.
2. They do not say it is cooling.
3. They predict it may start cooling in 35 years.
4. Are't they the guys that sell oil?
Are these the same scientists that blew up 5 rockets on the launch pad while trying to send cosmonauts to the moon?
Seems plausible to me, given the recent prolonged period of stalled warming (Cooling?)
I agree with anything that doesn't push that global warming myth
Have them explaine the ice caps melting
It's not a consensus, you are making this up.
their analysis maybe forced on them by their petrostate. It's highly unlikely given what every other climatologist is publishing.
According to scientists from the Pulkovo Observatory in St.Petersburg, solar activity is waning, so the average yearly temperature will begin to decline as well. This could go on for 200-250 years.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_04_22/Cooling-in-the-Arctic-what-to-expect/
I really don't speak Russian.
They have not been converted by the EPA .
.
