Here is where NASA found a 'glitch' in temperature recordings and had to correct it.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/1934-hot...
Now we know that 'glitch' has a name. It is Jimmy Hansen.
http://www.c3headlines.com/fabricating-f...
Also, you have Phil Jones over in the UK who reluctantly admitted that he destroyed temperature data who said, 'If they ever find out there's an FOI here in UK, I think I'll delete the file rather than hand it over.'
These are considered the bastions of GW. How totally evil!
As Hilary said,
what difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again,
and as Obama said
'I've Got a Pen and I've Got a Phone'
Sure, I don't see why he can't just cross them out.
He did promise to lower the seas.
They lost thousands of emails from the IRS targeting their political enemies.
How hard could it be to be to lose some temperature records?
Obama can't make laws but that never stopped him in the past.
These records exist in thousands of places--including many outside the government. They are here for good.
While electronic records may be tampered with fairly easily, it becomes much harder once they're public. Tampering with hard copy records scattered throughout the world is even harder.
How much do you understand about how CO2 drives temperature, when it only makes up 0.04% of our whole atmosphere? Climate science still can't come up with a formula that says X amount of CO2 times Y amount of other temperature influences equals Z temperature rise. We are talking about 0.87C rise in 353 years.
Current temperatures are deceiving. Recently, ocean surface temperatures have shown a rise. Upon further review, we found out that ocean surface winds have diminished by quite a bit. Surface winds are responsible for "scrubbing off" temperatures (heat) from the ocean surface. What does that mean when it comes to accurately depicting ocean temperatures when using them with anomalies? Is there a "correction" factored into the ocean-surface temperature readings that allows for reduced winds?
Climate Science has a lot to learn before they can make "BOLD" statements to the general public. Governments are "puppets" to the ELITES. Influencing governmental lawyering by deceiving the general public is what keeps the ELITES in charge. That's the REAL WORLD when it comes to POLITICS!!!
Only denialists want to eliminate the records.
No
Certain climate researchers have uncovered temperature records showing that the 1930's were the warmest period of the twentieth century.
Even if true, these records are counter-productive, as they tend to undermine the important work of reducing carbon and stopping global warming, by disagreeing with reverse-directed trend models.
How can historical temperature records be eliminated?
Can Obama make a law to have them destroyed, so that we can move ahead into the future without old temperature readings hampering the work of climate science?
