Try and understand one thing about the "Monetary Elites" and how they have operated for years :
"Their biggest client is Government itself. Governments around the world are a guaranteed payment to them. That is the law unless the Federal Reserve System is abolished and Governments are no longer allowed to borrow money through "fractional reserve lending" practices to pay bills and live within their means. Until that happens, there is no reason to go against any Government's wishes."
Their scientific assessments aren't very scientific. Those documents you refer to are not 'peer reviewed'. (You see, if you can use that crap we can too.) This was written by PR people who obviously are writing to the unwashed of our society.
Now let us take Chevron's claims:
? At Chevron, we recognize and share the concerns of governments and the public about climate change and the role of greenhouse gases (GHGs).
All true scientists recognize and share concerns of Governments and especially the public. That is why we try to tell you the truth. Now you have to know that ACC has never been defined so it has to be totally PR bunk.
? There is a widespread view that the increase in GHGs is leading to climate change, with adverse effects on the environment.
Yes there is a widespread view. And that view is bogus. The reason for that view is that those who spew that view are disciples of Goebbel's, where if you repeat a lie long enough and loud enough, that false view will become widespread.
To Cato:
? Climate change has occurred and will occur in the United States.
Yes we totally agree: And these changes took place before Al Gore.
This just goes to show that you greenies that you deem PR BS (Bad Science, to you Y!A censors.) as gospel. Not very smart, if you ask me.
Only in as much as that they are part of the Right-Wing Fascist Capitalist Conspiracy
You are just making some of your fellow alarmists look like assses because they can't seem help but to blame Exxon Mobil and the Koch brothers for funding all skeptics. Cato's comment is almost laughable for it's meaninglessness.
This is'nt only in the field of AGW, but there 's a lot more and need to........
Nope, those are reasonable statement about climate change.
These guys however are on a different planet. They simply refuse to acknowledge that all that is good in life is due to cheap energy and capitalism: http://www.ecosocialistsunite.com/
"Eco-socialists advocate dismantling capitalism..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eco-sociali...
"Ecosocialism or barbarism: There is no third way" http://climateandcapitalism.com/
I'm politically on the left and these people who are way more left than I scare the crap out of me (as do people on the far right). The center needs to regain control and right the ship which is headed for the rocks.
So those of you out there on the right centre, we need to work together and soon.
_______________________________________...
Edit: Actually, I have now found a definitive answer to your question: http://conspiracy.wikia.com/wiki/Global_...
1. Exxon-Mobile
? Rising greenhouse gas emissions pose significant risks to society and ecosystems.
http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/safety_climate.aspx
2. Chevron
? At Chevron, we recognize and share the concerns of governments and the public about climate change and the role of greenhouse gases (GHGs).
? There is a widespread view that the increase in GHGs is leading to climate change, with adverse effects on the environment.
http://www.chevron.com/globalissues/climatechange/faq/
3. The Cato Institute
? Climate change is unequivocal, and human activity plays some part in it.
? Climate change has occurred and will occur in the United States.
? Sea level rise caused by global warming
http://www.cato.org/pubs/Global-Climate-Change-Impacts.pdf
