Big words there, but perhaps before you argue that global warming is overstated and within the bounds of natural variation in a long thesis or paragraph, you should first learn how to write a complete sentence?

The theory of AGW is not even close to scientific.

Quote by Will Happer, Princeton University physicist, former Director of Energy Research at the Department of Energy: “I had the privilege of being fired by Al Gore, since I refused to go along with his alarmism....I have spent a long research career studying physics that is closely related to the greenhouse effect....Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science. The earth's climate is changing now, as it always has. There is no evidence that the changes differ in any qualitative way from those of the past.”

A scam is when the scammer asks for money up front and does not deliver the goods that scammer promised. The AGW scam fits that description to a 'T'.

Simply put, prove AGW first. Then ask for money. That is the scientific way.

Global Warming ended in 2012. Mike

Read sceptical science "arguments" section for some ideas.

in what field? Narrow it down a bit. Is this about science, politics, economics or sociology?

This is a good opportunity to do some research so you can do your own work. Not our job

Here are a few sites that might help:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesis_sta...

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resou...

http://clas.uiowa.edu/history/teaching-a...

http://grammar-and-composition.yoexpert....

Good luck!