To a greenie the unrealistic is real. They see a crises in everything that can advance their evil cause and ignore everything else. They are inconsistent in their logic because, if they were consistent their agenda would fall apart in a heartbeat. The create a crises, then attempt to sell everyone that they are the saviors of the earth and that everyone should get in line and do what they say so they can save the world. And all over a crises that is not crises at all.

Quotes by H.L. Mencken, famous columnist: "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed ― and hence clamorous to be led to safety ― by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." And, "The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the urge to rule it."

How much clearer can you get? The head greenies even know it and when by themselves admit that it is a big scam.

Quote by Club of Rome: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill....All these dangers are caused by human intervention....and thus the “real enemy, then, is humanity itself....believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realize world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is “a real one or….one invented for the purpose."

Almost every type of food is genetically modified. Why do you think I deny the science for genetically modified food? Pretty much everyone eats some type of it. Several types of grain have been so genetically modified that the original versions no longer exist. Heck, modern bananas are genetically modified. People that believe GMOs to be some big bad thing do not understand what exactly a genetically modified food is. There are, of course, some types of GMOs that are bad just as there are some types that are good. I'll just count this as another one of your lies.

GMO's might be safe, but for me there is insufficient independant testing, I am not going to eat something that Monsanto says is safe.

There is too much chemicals and sh!t in our food as it is, I buy a locally made jam, that contains strawberry's lemon juice, sugar and pectin, and nothing else it tastes and keeps superbly, other jams on my supermarket shelf have a list of chemicals as long as your arm.

And do you have an example of a "warmer" who is against GMOs? Twenty years from now, if food production is still increasing, GMOs will probably be part of the reason.

Not everyone who accepts AGW, is an environmentalist, or a leftie.

Why do you falsely assume that people who understand the science of global warming don't understand the science of gmo?

Sugar is largely believed to be safe as well, but people still want it labeled on their products. Just because something is deemed safe doesn't mean consumers shouldn't be told what's in their food. Just because global warming is factual doesn't mean we don't have to continually remind republicans that weather and climate are two different things.

dunno

Gmo hysteericals is a fad.

All corns we eats is gmo corn

Deniers are more often confused

You make generalizations that are not in fact true

Can they really be smart if they deny a science? GMO's are accepted safe by well over 99% of geneticists, and have a 40 year track record of being safe. But most of the people who accept one "science" are skeptic of real science because they just can't understand the complexity of the genome. How do these skeptics get away with calling others names when they are even more ignorant of real science themselves?