> Will 'MILLIONS DIE' without a carbon tax?

Will 'MILLIONS DIE' without a carbon tax?

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
You will find the odd fruit loop in both sides of politics, the Republicans have Jim Inhofe,

p.s. I think you will find the word is spelled 'liar' unless you are suggesting communists need a nap

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Lier

Carbon taxes are a political means to try and reduce carbon, are they perfect, probably not, but it beats hiding your head in the sand and pretending it's not happening.

I guess deniers have to play this sort of game, trying to pick out obscure political characters and Hollywood movies as talking points to try and cover the fact they have no real reply to the science.

Watching deniers like kano pretend they understand these issues is sad, he seems to think sea level is rising at a fixed rate, basic physics should tell him that as temperature increases the rate of sea level will rise and in fact the tide gauge data shows that with rates up to 1.7mm per year up to the nineties gowning to the current 3.1mm per year, almost doubling as temperature climbed to the current 0.8c rise, if that rate of temp rise is around the minimum the IPCC estimate 2c, then sea level rise will increase correspondingly, as ice melts you have not just the volume added to the oceans but the land exposed it warms more than the ice and snow did, the same is true of Arctic sea ice as it melts it allows more sea water to be warmed by the Sun adding further to thermal expansion.

Temperature as it stands now is around the A2 estimates (one of the higher IPCC estimates)

http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data...

Which would, if it continues give us around a 3c rise, that is the sort of temperature that would put us on track for over 1m of sea level rise by the end of the century, again if kano new the first thing about this sort of thing he would know that sea level rise also increases and magnifies things like king tides and storm surges.

It seems to be the deniers stance that sea level will some how directly kill people, I'm not sure how they reach such a conclusion given the obvious slow nature of sea level, even at higher rates, the long term effects can and most likely kill million through displacement and flooding of land on which people live and grow food, a 1m sea level would affect most of the coasts of the entire world.

Those like kano seem to support their delusions through an array of blogs and a well demonstrated lack of understanding of basic physics as well as a willingness to accept almost any wild and fanciful conspiracy theory, of which there have been many, blaming in turn Al Gore, Greens, scientists, communists and politicians. Funny how the conspiracies all link to fringe hatreds that already existed, it's almost as if someone was inventing conspiracies to draw in various fringe groups, of course deniers won't talk about this as it shows the nonsense their arguments are built on. But as many of them move back and forth from one conspiracy to the next and back again, it would seem they don't really believe them either.

lobal warming conspiracy theory is a collection of allegations that, through worldwide acts of professional and criminal misconduct, the science behind anthropogenic global warming has been invented and is being perpetuated for financial or ideological reasons. With all of the hysteria, all of the fear, all of the phony science, could it be that man-made global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people and is the biggest anti-America left wing conspiracy theories.

The 1 universal, undeniable truth that I think everyone should agree on, with regards to climate change, is that it is a heavily politicized movement. It started that way. It was galvanized with alarming predictions of which the average person is helpless to do anything about ( just like the war on terrorism.)

In fact the similarities between the War on Terror and Climate Change are so numerous that I am alarmed. Both have their roots in the early 90's.

Both launched international campaigns in stunning synchronicity after recent disasters. Both events have our leaders asking us to sacrifice something for the greater good even though they themselves sacrifice little to nothing. Both have their front men to explain the intricacies of the situation and why they are so divinely qualified to remedy the problem with more of our funding :) Both Climate Change and the War On Terror have deeply penetrated our society like a culture that is given to us( from the top down.) Both strategically undermine the sovereignty of all participating nations whilst strengthening the emerging world government.

He represents the loony left of the democrat party perfectly . He wants to Stick his hand in the Carbon tax cookie jar a pull out millions for himself .

million already do die of weather disasters, floods and drought. nothing new here.

Billions are spent repairing after extreme events like hurricanes and floods, this is nature's own "carbon tax"

yes humans are responsible for climate change in the past 150 years, a way to reduce CO2 emissions will go a long way in preventing more problems for future generations. Unfortunately, those who are not born yet do not vote or pay taxes, so they do not count. Our generation does not see benefit in paying for a problem others will pay for.

Yet another fear appeal, presented without visible means of support. This has been the method used by the environmental left since the 1950s: lie, stir up fear, get their programs passed, and when the basis is later shown to be inconclusive, they move on to another fear appeal.

It's sad to see science besmirched by politics, millions will die (how?) I lived in Kuwait City for 7 years the hottest city on earth and I didn't die, sea level rise hmm 6.7inches in a century, if you stand on a beach above high tide mark it might take 50yrs before your feet get wet.

Extreme storms, well historical records tells us there are no more extreme storms now than before, and if you think about it, you are more likely to get extreme weather with a cooling climate, as it is the difference between atmospheric temperatures and surface temps that cause weather, the atmosphere warms and cools faster than land or oceans, so with warming, less temperature difference, with cooling, more temperature difference.

I don't even see why a little global warming would be bad.

http://www.greatwavesofchange.org, a free book that really explains alot about what we will have to learn to navigate in our near future.

I think he just has Jeff M or Trevor as his press agent.

This is a good example of Goebbels' principle. Lie, Lie, Lie. And if you get caught, just jack up the rhetoric.

Of course, coming from Joisey, this is normal. "Hey! Nice place yah got here. For a thousand bucks we'll see to it that dis place doesn't burn down."

If someone comes up with a plan to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels without bringing in a carbon tax, no.

mateo



And of course, you mean the 1890s, although the roots of global warming go back further.

http://www.aip.org/history/climate/timel...

Do you believe this Communist lier?

'Climate change is real, and humans are to blame,' warns New Jersey Democratic Rep. Rush Holt in a 90-second YouTube campaign ad released Monday. And without a carbon tax, he warns in a shorter 15-second ad, 'millions will die.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2376971/MILLIONS-WILL-DIE-carbon-tax-fix-global-warming-says-New-Jersey-U-S-Senate-candidate-online-campaign-ad.html

Yes, and they will all be Commie/Democrats dying of frustration because they can't rob us with a carbon tax.

-----------------------