> Who is more beneficial to mankind, Mobil-Exxon who we get a lot of benefit from, or people like Al Gore who get rich fro

Who is more beneficial to mankind, Mobil-Exxon who we get a lot of benefit from, or people like Al Gore who get rich fro

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
Let's just ride our bikes around the world and let Al Gore and the like-minded fly their expensive jets to wherever they want.

Driving a car at 60 mph (non-stop - 24/7) one can cover the entire State of Rhode Island (1045 square miles) in just under 3 years, but what can anyone "really" see going that fast?

... or the efficiency we have with fossil fuels has afforded the uninhibited (free world) the opportunity to do more for others who are inhibited (those governed by Government ELITES - the suppressed).

Fossil fuels and Exxon Mobile have given us more of an opportunity to help others than what a Totalitarian Government (environmentalist controlled) would ever give us the opportunity to do.

---------------------------

If Al Gore thinks that the use of fossil fuels is so detrimental to the planet, then he should become a real sheep herder and stop trying to herd people towards his environmental hypocrisy movement.

Mobil-Exxon grew rich from providing energy to us people, energy to propel us to a new prosperity.

Al Gore and his family grew rich from providing us with tobacco.

Mobil-Exxon. Al Gore and his Alarmist "scientist" sock puppets have done nothing to enhance life on our planet. It could be argued that the Alarmists have contributed to Third World countries' inability to cope with famine and disease (ie...Ebola) by discouraging their development of cheap, reliable fossil fuel energy.

I know math was not one of your strengths in school, like delinquency, truancy, being expelled for cheating and sassing the teacher, but try to compare the net worth of Al Gore to the net worth of Exxon-Mobile.

Mobil-Exxon, of course

Neither. I consider them both major problems.

you misuse Yahoo Answers