Also, what is the societal costs of eliminating most fossil fuel use?

Catastrophic costs are not there. Basic physics says that doubling of CO2 levels would warm the planet by 1.2C. Then scientists expand on this with positive feedbacks built into models to claim higher amounts of warming, when actually Nature is a stable system that would have negative feedbacks that would moderate this warming.

On top of that, the activists make up scary scenarios as to the effects of global warming.

The societal costs of eliminating fossil fuel use is to consign people to poverty. Increasing income inequality as the wealthy would be the only ones who can afford the remaining fossil fuels that are allowed for use at $20 a gallon for gas.

Huh projected, you mean the ridiculous proposals that global warming will cause rising sea levels, flooding of Cities and Islands, damage to agriculture and famine, heat waves and droughts, increasing deserts and floods.

Well the only evidence we have so far is a huge increase in agricultural food production, and a large increase in vegetation worldwide (greening our planet) plus deserts seem to be receding.

The societal costs of eliminating fossil fuels (climate policies) will be absolutely huge, our whole global economy depends on the availability of reliable cheap energy, take this away and a slump or depression is bound to happen worldwide, with an increasing probability of war between the haves and have nots.

1) As an alarmist I've never said global warming will be catastrophic. THIS IS A DENIER MYTH.

2) Of course global warming will be catastrophic. Only deniers think it won't be.

3) Oh, I see the paradox now. Okay, to get people on our side we've always claimed that global warming will be catastrophic but we didn't like the deniers calling us out on it. So yes, global warming will definitely be catastrophic but no we never said it will be catastrophic.Does that make sense? It;s like when we say there is no global warming pause and then we come up with several scenarios to explain why there is a global warming pause. If you disassociate yourself from reality like we have it actually kind of makes sense. So yes, global warming will be catastrophic but we've never claimed it will be catastrophic.

Sujmmarize, in a paragraph, using only information available in 1939, the projected catastropohic consequences of WW2.

In addition, using the same conditions, summarize the social consequences of worldwide air travel.

I suggest you watch the videos below to answer those questions.

Here's the facts:

There is NO **man-made** Global Warming and there has never been any.

What global warming? It's been cooling for at least 12 years according to HadCrut3 & HadCrut4 is nearly flat. http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut...

According to RSS Satellite data there has been no warming for more than 18 years.