http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record...
“Climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for a broad range of human and natural systems.”
http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpine...
“Choices made now about carbon dioxide emissions reductions will affect climate change impacts experienced not just over the next few decades but also in coming centuries and millennia…Because CO2 in the atmosphere is long lived, it can effectively lock the Earth and future generations into a range of impacts, some of which could become very severe.”
http://www.physics.fsu.edu/awards/NAS/
“The Academy membership is composed of approximately 2,100 members and 380 foreign associates, of whom nearly 200 have won Nobel Prizes. Members and foreign associates of the Academy are elected in recognition of their distinguished and continuing achievements in original research; election to the Academy is considered one of the highest honors that can be accorded a scientist or engineer.”
http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/...
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/timel...
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/index...
There is no price that they could pay that would compensate for the damages done. That is the simple and real answer.
The AGWT is not wrong. At the very worst, it may not explain everything concerning our climate. However, it is by far the best scientific theory we have that best explains the observations. There are no competing theories that even come close to explaining the observations being made now. None, nada, zilch and absolutely zero. How does one warrant going to jail when the best scientific theory at the world's disposal is being used? This would indicate that anyone using lesser scientific theories should be executed? The ones that make their posts based solely on ideology, religion or political affiliations should have their families executed?
Not really the term (realist) is a symbolic reference, that may or may not have anything at all to do with reality.
The big picture: Why would anyone want to forfeit civil liberties in lieu of security. The latter being the liberal illusion or neorealist perspective. Having explained the fundamentals, alarmist antagonist just seem totally lost on the relative front.
Well nothing wrong with parking their SUV's but when you start messing around with carbon taxes, and raising prices, reducing jobs, having old people die in the winter because they can't heat their homes,
Come up with cheap available, reliable energy first and then we will all change.
Be happy to send you a graph, showing the weakness of the GW premise. The science simply DOES NOT support Global Warming...which has become dogma and politics, more than reason.
Can you listen to yourself, I think your ignorant but I don't think you should go to jail. I think it's nobel to want to make the world a better place but the only thing you can change in this world is yourself. Just because we don't agree government mandate is the best way to come up with the most effective alternative to energy doesn't mean we disagree that we need to come up with alternative energy sources. We already know that according to "realist" hundreds of thousands have already died from AGW and I accept the punishment of having to listen to the ignorance of liberals and their logical fallacies.
You wouldn't know what a 'denialist' thinks. You don't have the mental facilities, obviously.
Saffy: You didn't respond to the question, which is against Y!A community guidelines. Also, you just ranted, which is against Y!A community guidelines. Also you just used foul language, which is against Y!A community guidelines.
How come you greenies get away with it?
EDIT:
Ha! Ha! Just look at Prico kissing up to someone, Prof Richard Parncutt, who outright states that he is for killing a certain group of people because of their beliefs. Yet all the while twisting the words of others who do not believe such.
Prico by doing this has exposed himself as a fraudulent person, lacking of intellect and integrity (which is the trademark of all greenies) and a person of consistent irrational behavior.
Quote by George Monbiot, a UK Guardian environmental journalist: "...every time someone dies as a result of floods in Bangladesh, an airline executive should be dragged out of his office and drowned."
This man is embraced by the likes of Prico.
Quote by Jill Singer, Australian green and "journalist": "I'm prepared to keep an open mind and propose another stunt for climate sceptics - put your strong views to the test by exposing yourselves to high concentrations of either carbon dioxide or some other colourless, odourless gas - say, carbon monoxide."
This person is embraced by the likes of Prico.
Quote by Maurice King, well known UK professor: “Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”
Mortality control is just what Prico and his likes are slobbering all over for.
Quote by David Graber, scientist U.S. Nat'l Park Services: "We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth. It is cosmically unlikely that the developed world will choose to end its orgy of fossil energy consumption, and the Third World its suicidal consumption of landscape. Until such time as Homo Sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.”
Wow! Does that now sound like one of Prico's cohorts is saying something of which he is accusing us of saying (Of course we are not).
Quote by Ingrid Newkirk, a former PETA President: “The extinction of Homo Sapiens would mean survival for millions, if not billions, of Earth-dwelling species. Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on Earth - social and environmental.”
Now that is a real friend of Prico's when hes says, "EXTERMINATE EVERYBODY!"
Notice all these full and accurate quotes come from 'the saviors of the Earth', Prico's cohorts.
EDIT:
This is reverse of the desired affect. Your plan of cap and tax will put an undue burden on these people and will do nothing to save the planet. Then why don't you do something to 'bring down the cost of alternative fuels'? Just sitting there crying about it and expecting others to give up their liberties and money is akin to a cry baby. Yes, a SUV is a Constitutional issue. We here in the US have an inherent right for the pursuit of happiness. That is a stated goal. Why are you always trying to take that away from us? Your kind's stated goal is to take that pursuit away from us.
Quote by Paul Ehrlich, professor, Stanford University: “Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.”
Cheap abundant energy would be a good thing.
Definitely an oxymoron. denialists don't have to think they are so easily led around by their noses
Prison? It is worse then that They want to exile [1] them and hunt them down like dingo's and dispose of them accordingly. [2] Not one of the deniers denounced those statements when asked. [3]
Your "if people were to die because of global warming?"
People are dieing because of global warming myths, that's the tragedy.
You socialists have not changed since the worst excesses of Joseph Stalin with your propaganda and "programs" to force people off their land and into concentration camps.
The "Green Gulag".
Just because we want them to park their SUVS and produce electricity with something cleaner than coal, denialists think that realists should go to jail. What penalty would denailsts be willing to pay if people were to die because of global warming?
How long have you known you were clairvoyant? When did you first begin to have these feelings that you could hear others' thoughts? Are you off your meds? Do you need us to call someone? We're here to help...
