Trevor,

What is your level of confidence in the ocean heat content data you present?

I would be very hard-pressed to say that the current 3000 bouys they use for measuring the ocean temperature would give even a reasonable estimate of the heat content of the entire ocean.

Let's say, for argument, however, that the 3000 is sufficient to estimate the temperature of the ocean to say 0.05 degrees. You are only talking about an increase of how many degrees??? Over how long???

Now pretending that 3000 is enough for a reasonable estimate of coean temperature across the ENTIRE WORLD, your graph goes back to 1955. Did we have many devices that collected temperature data to 2000 meters back in 1955???

Further, I note how you use heat content instead of average temperature. Care to say why??? I know why. It is because the temperature change is SO SMALL as to not add anything to the discussion. If people see that you are talking about 0.1 degree of change, they will ignore your graph, WON'T THEY??? And just think of how obvious it will become that the degree of uncertainty in the measure given the SMALL amount of change make the entire graphic useless.

But don't worry. I have solved the problem of the missing heat. If you graph out the price of rice in China, you will note that it has been increasing over the past 18 years. THEREFORE, the heat is hiding in Chinese rice, that little thermal dickens.

You have this obsession that the world is cooling down. It isn’t and you have no evidence to back this up. The best you can do is to carefully cherry-pick data from selected temperature records and present them in an unscientific and intellectually dishonest manner.

Atmospheric temperatures have changed little in the last 15 or so years as can be seen in the graph below: