If Eschenbach wants to be taken seriously he needs to publish his work somewhere other than on denier blogs. Right now even Roy Spencer trashes him.
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2013/10/citi...
Honestly, though, for a massage therapist he puts in a lot of work on climate. But part of the reason for publishing is that you have to formalize your arguments in a way that others can check what you've done, and for formal statistical analysis to take place. Otherwise you're only kidding yourself that you are doing science.
EDIT: Kano, that's just a cop-out. He's not trying. Even Anthony Watts got his name on a paper, and so did Forrest Mims III. Neither of those guys have Ph.D.s and both reject AGW. If Roy Spencer doesn't look favorably on it, though, there are probably good reasons it wouldn't get published.
Global Warming ended in 2012 and this climate is like it was in the 1970's before Global Warming. Mike
WUWT? I doubt it.
There is no need to debunk such obvious bunk
No, it is an example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
I'm skeptical of the idea that it is.
CO2 is not the Thermostat.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/28/the-thermostatic-throttle/
