Just as much as the New York Times relies on a chef critic to make statements against republicans about science : http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/ed...
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/05/opinio...
It seems that "if" you have a column to fill with letters, then any environmentalist will fill the void.
Collecting data is easy. Collecting "accurate data" is very hard even for the best of scientists.
Climate Clowns will never understand real science.
Certainly not.
Data has always been manipulated not only in carbon emissions but in description or lack thereof when it comes to exactly what is the offender (Business, industry, location or country responsible)
When multibillion dollar deals are at stake, few people have the strength of character to resist a bribe or risk to their lives if they don't comply with the numbers.
I would still need evidence not to. And don't bother posting your video of a graph taped to a see-saw. That is not evidence.
No way!!!! This would be part of the racket of AGW.
Do you trust anyone that isn't saying exactly what you want to hear?
yes
No.
