Hint: You can't. You are simply absolutely wrong. There are not many, there is a small handful worldwide and they don't agree with each other.
On the other hand the science academies of the world all agree that human cause is "indisputable". That is the word of the great scientists is the world: it can no longer be disputed (and that was four years ago).
People who claim the warming is somehow natural usually claim just that it is "natural", as though that is an explanation, as though changes happen by magic rather than physics. A "natural" explanation would have to explain all observations, why it is happening more at night than day, how the CO2 thrown-off by human activity could not cause the atmosphere to retain more heat, why the stratosphere is cooling as the troposphere warms ...
Here it the simple truth: whichever of you is trying to claim that human activity is not warming the atmosphere is simply ignorant of how climate works and needs to educate him/herself. They simply do not know what they are talking about. Whichever is claiming there is a natural cause of the warming need to identify the cause, explain the support for that cause and reconcile it with the proofs that warming is caused by human activity. Their contribution to science would be a great gift to humanity be so far nobody who studies climate has been able to do that.
We are speeding the process up, exactly as the Dinosaurs did with their methane emissions.
Ours is Carbon Di-oxide and Methane.
The world is very used to cleansing itself, and it will.
Some say it is a mixture of both, although the human activity cannot completely or physically influence the ULTIMATE outcome of what is a completely natural cycle. However over all, in terms of what WE the general public are told about global warming, or the climate change as it is now known, is not only completely innacurate but amounts to a complete FRAUD.
Nature
Here's a small list Baccheus.
Dr. Michael Coffman – CEO Sovereignty International
James Inhoff - Congressman
Dr. Robert C. Balling – Former Director, Office of Climatology (U. of Az)
Professor Tim Patterson – Dept. of Earth Sciences, Carlton University (Can.)
Professor Tim Ball – Dept. of Climatology, University of Winnipeg
Dr. Ian Clark – Dept. of Earth Sciences
Professor John Christy – IPCC Lead Author
Professor Richard Lindzen – IPCC & M.I.T.
Senator Chuck Hagel – (R-Neb) Foreign Relations Committee
Congressman Don Young – (R-AK) House Resources Committee
Phyllis Schlafly – President, Eagle Forum
Dr. Fred Singer – Atmospheric Scientist, Emeritis – George Mason Univ.
Professor Tim Patterson – Dept. of Earth Sciences, Univ. of Carlton
Stephen MacIntyre – Analyst, Toronto Canada
Professor Ross McKitrick – Dept. of Economics, The Univ. of Guelph
Dr. Vincent Gray – Expert IPCC Reviewer, Climate Consultant, New Zealand
Chris Horner – “Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming”
Dr. Robert Davis – University of Virginia
Dr. Roy Spencer – Senior Scientist for Climate Studies, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center
Dr. Patrick J. Michaels – University of Virginia
William Gray – National Hurricane Center
Dr. Thomas gale Moore – Hoover Institution
Dr. C. Lee Campbell – Professor of Plant Pathology, N.C. State Univ.
Dr. Gustaaf Anton van den Berg – Head, Glasshouse Climate and Technology, PBG
Dr. James Arthur Bunce – Agriculture Research Service, USDA
David Bromwich – Ohio State University
These people all agree that it's cyclical and not man-made.
There are probably at least 100,000 more that will agree with all of these well-known scientists and important people with brains enough to understand the science. Climate Science will always put their spin on the science to make it look like humans have a tremendous impact, but the mathematical fact remains: Human forcing of the "Greenhouse Gas Effect" is still less than 1% at any given time. They argue that there is a cumulative effect, but they fall short on presenting that evidence with their inaccurate climate modeling.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...
http://www.dailytech.com/NASA+Study+Ackn... (Nasa acknowledging solar cycle has to do with "global warming")
http://joannenova.com.au/global-warming-...
(Ice core graphs depicting C02 FOLLOWING temperature, along with references to contributing scientists)
http://www.petitionproject.org/index.php
(thousands of scientists with PhD's relating to climate study who do not support "global warming")
http://www.climatedepot.com/a/9035/SPECI...
(1000 more scientists challenging al gore)
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/04/05/co...
(Sun controls climate)
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/...
(Polar bears not in danger)
http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article...
(Glacier calving natural process)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displacemen...
(In relation to "rising sea levels" .. basic grade 1 science)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424...
(another 16 well known scientists who disagree with global warming)
me and my friend have been arguing about this for awhile and i'd like to hear your thoughts on it.
why are there many exports on climate that say its cyclical and not man-made?
all answers appreciated!
