> Career paths in Environmental Politics?

Career paths in Environmental Politics?

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
I have talked to someone just like yourself who went into environmental law. What he told me is that environmental law is a joke. It is simply one corporation trying to gain an advantage over another corporation via the judicial system.

You want to make a difference? Find where your skills lie and contribute to society in that manner. If your skills lie in science and math, we could certainly use more people skilled in those areas and you will never be hurting for gainful employment.

As for international politics, you have to be kidding me. We are quite literally on the verge of WW3. With all the crap going on in the ME, Russia, China, etc, we could be looking at global nuclear war. You are worried about 0.8 degrees of temp rise over the past 100 years???

As for your view of saving the world: Be kind to others and raise your children to be kind, considerate and productive citizens. If you do these things, you will help mankind far more than some attempt to follow the newest environmental cause.

" I want to do something that can help get the world in the right direction but not sure what my options are, do you guys have any ideas?" Well then get across to the public that Global Warming, Climate Change or environmental movements by any other name is causing great harm to the world. Economies have been ruined. Lives have been ruined. Evil people acting as the 'Saviors of the World' like Al Gore and George Soros have become richer by the promotion of this unfounded theory. Many people go to bed scared that the is world burning up.

We all know that this CC movement is a thinly veiled attempt to get every person signed on to Communism or a one world government.

Quote by Ottmar Edenhoffer, high level UN-IPCC official: "We redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy...Basically it's a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization...One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore."

Those of the green side know that the science is phony. But they pursue it anyway because it gains political control.

Quote by Christine Stewart, former Canadian Environment Minister: “No matter if the science is all phoney, there are collateral environmental benefits.... climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.”

Quote by Timothy Wirth, U.S./UN functionary, former elected Democrat Senator: “We’ve got to ride the global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”

So clearly, these people know that CC and AGW have no scientific capital but a lie always does.

Joseph Goebbels,

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

So if you want to save the world, and are really sincere about it, find out the true science and stop politicizing the subject. For it is clear what the intentions of the leaders of this environmental movement are.

Quote from the UN's Own "Agenda 21": "Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level."

And what about those people who don't buckle under to the lies of the UN r are not re-oriented? Are they to be taken out to the village square with their hands tied and their mouth gagged then shot and left as a warning to the rest to get in line or else? That is happening in Gaza right now. Do you want to be a part in taking female nurses out and decapitating them as ISIS is doing right now in Iraq?

Quote by Gus Hall, former leader of the Communist Party USA: "Human society cannot basically stop the destruction of the environment under capitalism. Socialism is the only structure that makes it possible."

Well you can be smart enough to see what happened in Russia back a hundred years ago when people did not go along with Stalin. What horrible torture! What horrible deaths! And what misery for the masses that followed and all so that a few power hungry evil people could live the life of luxury. Yes Stalin and Hitler were our to save the world too.

Is it politics or science you are truly interested in? Remember Science and nature have historically provided the needs of the people. Politics and especially Communism can only ration out the needs of the people. Just look at Russia and Cuba.

Who might pay you, and to do what?

Currently, the fossil fuel industry pays people to lobby against any legislation regulating fossil fuel use.

Various solar panel and turbine producers lobby to get legislation favorable to their products, and prevent legislation harmful to their products.

Various environmental groups lobby to get legislation friendly to the environment passed.

Of these, the fossil fuel industry has, by far, the most money available to push their agenda.

However, to get any of that money, you probably have to have some sort of reputation.

At this point, I wouldn't be restricting my studies to this very limited sector of the economy.

It is hoped that you don't make your quest about an emotional attachment. It seems that Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is more about how people "feel" than it is about the "facts".

Case and point:

http://phys.org/news/2014-09-discrepancy...

" ... a jump in Greenland's air temperatures of 10-15 degrees (C) in just a few decades beginning about 14,700 years ago. An apparent shutdown of the AMOC about 12,800 years ago caused an abrupt cooling of some 5-9 degrees (C), also over a matter of decades.

When the AMOC was reinvigorated again about 11,600 years ago, it caused a jump in temperatures of 8-, 11 degrees (C), which heralded the end of the ice age and the beginning of the climatically warm and stable Holocene period, which allowed human civilization to develop.

"For these extremely abrupt transitions, our data show a clear fingerprint of AMOC variations, which had not yet been established in the ice core studies," noted Buizert, who is in OSU's College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences. "Other evidence for AMOC changes exists in the marine sediment record and our work confirms those findings." ... "

The recent warming of 0.8C in the past 350 years means nothing if you think scientific research is accurate. Climate science is especially biased when it comes to media publications. It seems that media writers have a strong bias that is highly based on an emotional attachment which becomes an "emotionally biased political attachment" to the science.

"SAVE THE WORLD"?

From what?

Itself?

I am currently an undergrad majoring in Politics and International relations and am really beginning to grow a passion for the environment and global warming etc. I want to do something that can help get the world in the right direction but not sure what my options are, do you guys have any ideas? They don't have to be related to politics but would be useful as it is my degree.

Thanks!