I'm a very green person and do believe in global warming, but I keep talking to people who don't believe it and I need some evidence to help support?

There is plenty of evidence and broad consensus among mainsteam climate scientists that the earth is warming, even though there has been no measurable warming in the last 18 years.

There is a problem between knowing and doing. As of 2013, the world consumed 7.8 billion tons of coal per year. China alone consumed about half that, 3.56 billion tons, and China has no intention of reducing their coal consumption. I point this out because it really doesn't matter what an individual does or even a whole nation. China's contribution to atmospheric greenhouse gasses is enough to push us into runaway warming regardless of what the rest of the world does.

That's why I don't take the whole debate seriously. If CO2 is going to destroy the earth, it will. All this hullabaloo about alternative energy is just pissing in the ocean. There are many things you can do to help your little corner of the planet. If you want to talk sustainable or eco-friendly we can have a really good conversation.

I am a green person too and I want to look after the environment, however I do not believe in global warming and I am sickened my the vast amounts of money wasted on this political matter, when we could be doing something useful for this planet, like preventing deforestation, preventing our oceans being filled with plastic garbage and agricultural waste products and heavy metals from industry.

We could be planting trees or reclaiming deserts.

You can tell it is political, look at this push for green power (windmills and solar) it is not practical it cannot survive without huge subsidies, why? well if you carryout a proper analysis, you will find that the energy return on the energy invested, is such a low ratio that when you add the investment on back up generation (for when the wind does not blow or the sun shine) and the extra transmission lines needed the amount of energy returned is not a lot more than the energy invested in it.

Global warming is just not happening, contrary to what everybody tells you, temperatures are not rising (18yrs now) global sea ice is at average extent, Antarctic sea ice is at record high amounts, hurricanes tornadoes and wild fires, are lower than average, sea levels are rising at 6 inches for every 100yrs and slowing, while this is not proof it is a pretty good indication that it is not a serious situation and rushing into extreme actions to stop something that is not yet happening is a pretty foolish thing to do.

'm a very green person and do believe in global warming, but I keep talking to people who don't believe it and I need some evidence to help support?

15 answers ・ Global Warming ・ 7 hours ago

Instead of looking for evidence to support anthropogenic global warming, you should look at the evidence as a whole and try to determine if you think our CO2 emissions are causing significant harm. That is one of the dirty little tricks that alarmists pull on the gullible (actually most alarmists are also gullible so I don't mean to sound like they are purposefully fooling you). They want you to equate any warming with harmful catastrophic warming that needs their political agenda as a solution. In fact, there is very little evidence that our CO2 emissions have caused harmful warming. The warming in the last hundred years is about the same as it was in the previous 100 years. Crops are growing at record levels. More and more people are becoming prosperous and living good lives.

Statistically global warming and cooling has gone on for hundreds of years, as the earth naturally cycles through stages of doing either one. This is born out in history. Most recently there was a statement made in 1820 about the earth's ice melting and all the animals affected by that being forced to die off very very soon. They're still here and I always wonder to myself, "What's with that?"

Scientific sources like NASA and the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change bring together the scientific evidence.

http://www.ipcc.ch

http://climate.nasa.gov

The consensus among publishing climate scientists that most of the recent global warming is man-made is somewhere around 97%.

http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/...

An excellent blog that summarises this evidence is skepticalscience

http://www.skepticalscience.com/big-pict...

You should never just trust a blog, because there's a load of rubbish out there. Scientists filter rubbish by using the peer-reviewed literature: studies can't be published unless they've been checked by anonymous experts to filter out the stupidest mistakes. These studies are continually tested by new experiments later on.

Skepticalscience is good because it links constantly to scientific studies in the peer-reviewed literature. This is a sign of reliability.

A sign of unreliability would be working for a group like the Heartland Institute, a PR group that is paid to spread sciency-sounding information to try and prevent laws that might cost its clients any money. Previously they were paid by tobacco companies to deny that smoking causes cancer, and now they're paid by other groups to deny that humans are causing global warming. There are dozens of these groups, with clever-sounding names such as the "Global Warming Policy Foundation" or the "Friends of Science". Their glossy brochures or blog posts are not reliable sources of information. If someone is confident that their work is reliable, they submit it to a proper scientific journal for testing.

At least, that's how I approach science, and I'm a climate scientist.

Any Nationalized Academy for Sciences has established a good booklet precisely that will resolution an individual's doubts. Any NAS stands out as the correlation for Numerous most effective each and every, generated (on Abraham Lincoln's signature) precisely that will tips some of our united states during counts for challenging development. There does exist loads of information and much material that could be freely on the market. However , get started with any summing up booklet together with considerably more . extremely good knowledge.

The National Academy of Sciences has created a booklet specifically to answer your questions. The NAS is the association of America's greatest scientists, created (on Abraham Lincoln's signature) specifically to advise our nation in matters of complex science. There is lots of evidence and lots of information that is publicly available. But start with the summary booklet and you'll have a pretty solid understanding.

http://amser.org/index.php?P=AMSER--Reso...

http://www.rkm.com.au/ANIMATIONS/carbon-... <== here's the physics.

For both water and CO2. You really want to understand what it's saying.

The more water and CO2 there is in the atmosphere, the more heat the earth retains.

This is the basic science behind global warming.

Without the relatively small amount of water and CO2 in our atmosphere, the earth would be 60 degrees colder than it is.

Far below freezing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warm...

Wikipedia probably has the most complete description in one place.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warm...

"The finding that the climate has warmed in recent decades and that human activities are already contributing adversely to global climate change has been endorsed by every national science academy that has issued a statement on climate change, including the science academies of ALL OF THE MAJOR INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_...

"With the release of the revised statement by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists in 2007, no remaining scientific body of national or international standing is known to reject the basic findings of human influence on recent climate change."

IE, NO REPUTABLE SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATION NOW CLAIMS THAT AGW IS NOT REAL.

There is plenty of evidence and broad consensus among mainstream climate scientists that the earth is warming, even though there has been no measurable warming in the last 18 years. "The finding that the climate has warmed in recent decades and that human activities are already contributing adversely to global climate change has been endorsed by every national science academy that has issued a statement on climate change, including the science academies of ALL OF THE MAJOR INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES."

I'm a very green person and do believe in global warming, but I keep talking to people who don't believe it and I need some evidence to help support?

The National Academy of Sciences has created a booklet specifically to answer your questions. The NAS is the association of America's greatest scientists, created (on Abraham Lincoln's signature) specifically to advise our nation in matters of complex science. There is lots of evidence and lots of information that is publicly available. But start with the summary booklet and you'll have a pretty solid understanding.

http://nas-sites.org/americasclimatechoi...

NONE.

There is NO **man-made** Global Warming and there has never been any.

What global warming? It's been cooling for at least 12 years according to HadCrut3 & HadCrut4 is nearly flat. http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut...

According to RSS Satellite data there has been no warming for more than 18 years.