> If the 2.84 billion folks living in coastal areas were killed by AGW, wouldn't that solve the problem?

If the 2.84 billion folks living in coastal areas were killed by AGW, wouldn't that solve the problem?

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
Petito principii.

No, but cutting off the billions going to climate alarmists would allow this non-problem to die a natural death.

False premise. AGW doesn't exist. So how can something that doesn't exist kill anyone? Also, how can you solve a problem when one doesn't exist? The greenies do it all the time. They create a mythical problem then they come in an tax the living daylights out of us and regulate us.

Quotes by H.L. Mencken, famous columnist: "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed ― and hence clamorous to be led to safety ― by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." And, "The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the urge to rule it."

You are so visible and your schemes never work with intelligent people.

Quote by Noel Brown, UN official: "Entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of "eco-refugees," threatening political chaos."

When will they ever learn?

That would include Al Gore who bought that seaside mansion South of SF.

Oh wait, Al Gore has another mansion in TN he could stay at. Both together run a $10,000 a month electric bill. Such a hypocrite but the sheeple bought his lies and he made hundreds of millions of dollars on it all.

Technically.

But I prefer solutions that *don't* involve killing billions of people...

That's exactly what Green Peace and the Greenies are hoping for.

No, cuz the rest of the world still pollutes.

That's what we're trying to avoid.