> How is denying a century of science NOT denial?

How is denying a century of science NOT denial?

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
I found kano's question bizarre. Not only is the answer pointed out and explained to him on an almost daily basis, but his every question and answer is an outright rejection of something that he knows he does not understand - and since he is the person who writes those questions and answers, I think it is fair to assume that he knows he is a Denier.

How can kano or any of the bottom feeding Deniers who dedicate their every minute here to the denial of AGW and climate science not understand that they are denying AGW and climate science. After all, denying AGW and climate science is the very reason they are here. They are not skeptics because skepticism requires an educated and functional knowledge of science in general, and an informed understanding of the science specific to AGW. Denial, on the other hand, requires only ignorance - and no can argue that Denier ignorance is deficient in any way.

The climate change deniers also deny that the rich are getting richer at the expense of the working class and that Barack Obama is an actual American citizen.

More than a century of science but only about 50 years of organized funded denial thanks to coal, natural gas big oil and all the thinks tanks switching over from tobacco to GW denial Dirty little secrets

I personally prefer to label people as 'idiots' rather than 'deniers' ...

it is denial

In answer to Kano who has me blocked.

"Why should I be called a global warming deniers [sic]?"

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20140222224819AAHvvhM

http://www.aip.org/history/climate/timeline.htm

U.S. National Academy of Sciences, 2010:

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12782&page=1

“Climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for a broad range of human and natural systems.”

http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12877

“Choices made now about carbon dioxide emissions reductions will affect climate change impacts experienced not just over the next few decades but also in coming centuries and millennia…Because CO2 in the atmosphere is long lived, it can effectively lock the Earth and future generations into a range of impacts, some of which could become very severe.”

“The Academy membership is composed of approximately 2,100 members and 380 foreign associates, of whom nearly 200 have won Nobel Prizes. Members and foreign associates of the Academy are elected in recognition of their distinguished and continuing achievements in original research; election to the Academy is considered one of the highest honors that can be accorded a scientist or engineer.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_climate_change_science

http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200602/backpage.cfm

http://www.amazon.com/Rough-Climate-Change-Reference-Series/dp/1848365799

http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php