> Do global warming heretics get all their knowledge from phaux news?

Do global warming heretics get all their knowledge from phaux news?

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
No they get it from studying SCIENCE, of all things. A true scientist would never be swayed by mere words. Those that can, DO. Those that can't just report on it.

Adaviel you are a true Alinskyite. Rules For Radicals: ? Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Good job. Alinsky was a full blown Communist, in case you didn't know. This shows what side of the fence you are on. Ha! Ha!

We so-called realize that so-called popularity associated with so-called technology is actually so-called becoming so-called a part of the so-called cult, however laying stupidly regarding technology has been suspicious. So-called therefore, so-called great, so-called good fortune getting a so-called best solution for this so-called query, as well as many thanks (vaporize) with regard to so-called requesting (vaporize).

The 97% of scientists babble was exposed as a fraudulent claim long ago.



This is a propaganda tool: Rather than deal with the facts, act to demean your debate partner.

Studies show that belief in conspiracy theories is associated with low self-esteem and lower crystallized intelligence.

Some mainstream media present fringe ideas as a counterpoint to accepted ones in an attempt to boost sales by promoting discussion, calling it "journalistic balance".

Because they don't follow the advice of Weird Al and protect themselves from the brain waves transmitted by phaux news.



I so-called know that so-called acceptance of so-called science is so-called being so-called part of a so-called cult, but lying stupidly about science is being skeptical. So-called so, so-called good, so-called luck finding a so-called best answer to this so-called question, and thanks (vaporize) for so-called asking (vaporize).

republicans are dumb. They believe in many bible fairy tales but not in basic science.

List of scientists who are skeptical of global warming

Steven E. Koonin, theoretical physicist and Director of the Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York University[19]

Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences[20][21][22]

Nils-Axel M?rner, retired head of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics department at Stockholm University, former chairman of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution (1999–2003)[23]

Garth Paltridge, retired chief research scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, visiting fellow Australian National University[24]

Denis Rancourt, former professor of physics at University of Ottawa, research scientist in condensed matter physics, and in environmental and soil science[25][26][27]

Peter Stilbs, professor of physical chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm[28]

Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at the University of London[29]

Hendrik Tennekes, retired director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute [30]

Anastasios Tsonis, distinguished professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee[31]

Fritz Vahrenholt, German politician and energy executive with a doctorate in chemistry[32]

Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes

Graph showing the ability with which a global climate model is able to reconstruct the historical temperature record, and the degree to which those temperature changes can be decomposed into various forcing factors. It shows the effects of five forcing factors: greenhouse gases, man-made sulfate emissions, solar variability, ozone changes, and volcanic emissions.[33]

These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes than to human activities. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles.

Khabibullo Abdusamatov, astrophysicist at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences[34]

Sallie Baliunas, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[35][36]

Timothy Ball, professor emeritus of geography at the University of Winnipeg[37]

Robert M. Carter, former head of the school of earth sciences at James Cook University[38]

Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[39]

Chris de Freitas, associate professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland[40]

David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester[41]

Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University[42]

William M. Gray, professor emeritus and head of the Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University[43]

William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy, Princeton University[44]

Ole Humlum, professor of geology at the University of Oslo[45]

Wibj?rn Karlén, professor emeritus of geography and geology at the University of Stockholm.[46]

William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology[47]

David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware[48]

Anthony Lupo, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Missouri[49]

Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[50]

Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at Carleton University in Canada.[51][52]

Ian Plimer, professor emeritus of Mining Geology, the University of Adelaide.[53]

Arthur B. Robinson, American politician, biochemist and former faculty member at the University of California, San Diego[54]

Murry Salby, atmospheric scientist, former professor at Macquarie University[55]

Nicola Scafetta, research scientist in the physics department at Duke University[56][57]

Tom Segalstad, geologist; associate professor at University of Oslo[58]

Nir Shaviv, professor of physics focusing on astrophysics and climate science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem[59]

Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia[60][61][62]

Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[63]

Roy Spencer, meteorologist; principal research scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville[64]

Henrik Svensmark, physicist, Danish National Space Center[65]

George H. Taylor, retired director of the Oregon Climate Service at Oregon State University[66]

Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from University of Ottawa[67]

Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown

These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.

Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.[68]

Claude Allègre, French politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at Institute of Geophysics (Paris).[69]

Robert Balling, a professor of geography at Arizona State University.[70]

John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to several IPCC reports.[71][72]

Petr Chylek, space and remote sensing sciences researcher, Los Alamos National Laboratory.[73]

David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma.[74]

Ivar Giaever, professor emeritus of physics at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.[75]

Vincent R. Gray, New Zealander physical chemist with expertise in coal ashes[76]

Keith Idso, botanist, former adjunct professor of biology at Maricopa County Community College District and the vice president of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change[77]

Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists.[78]

Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences

These scientists have said that projected rising temperatures will be of little impact or a net positive for society or the environment.

Craig D. Idso, faculty researcher, Office of Climatology, Arizona State University and founder of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change [79]

Sherwood Idso, former research physicist, USDA Water Conservation Laboratory, and adjunct professor, Arizona State University[80]

Patrick Michaels, senior fellow at the Cato Institute and retired research professor of environmental science at the University of Virginia[81]

How could people not believe in global warming? Why does listening to phaux news cause someone lose faith in 97% of top scientists? What could help these global warming heretics come back into the fold?