http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/02/130228093412.htm
but what do you think?
Yes we have reached a tipping point 7 BILLION PEOPLE.
AGW is not science, it's hijacked science controlled by the UN, the media and other political organisations.
True science allows skeptical analysis, an open mind and criticisms, and doesn't resort to name calling,
Unfortunately we can no longer trust scientists, we have biased science in so many areas now, the food and drug industry, the medical and health care, agriculture, all doing biased corrupt twisted science reporting to fulfill their own ends.
I would have appreciated the article more if they would have shown evidence to support their article. Is there evidence based only on that biodiversity has returned after previous mass extinctions?
What the article addressed was tipping points in the ecology and not about tipping points in the climate. These are two very distinct things. Nowhere did the article suggest what would happen to the ecology if the climate reached certain tipping points. Whenever there has been rapid changes in the global climate before it has always resulted in mass extinctions. Now did life rebound and become diverse once again? Yes, so an ecological tipping point had not been reached that would have resulted in all life being removed from the planet or that only a few species were left to prosper. So, what is the article really saying? Is it only saying that tipping points have never been reached concerning biodiversity simply because biodiversity has returned after mass extinctions? .... Gee, doesn't that make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside?!?!
No. 'Tipping points 'are an artefact of the media, not the science community.
They keep moving the goalpost . And I think the Earth passed by several of them
and its still here .
These anti science holocaust deniers don't seem to think so...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/02/130228093412.htm
but what do you think?
