I mean, who would tell them what to think?

I do suppose there is junkscience that no longer gets paid by big tobacco.

But really, would they be at a loss for words?

Deniers or those who prefer to call themselves sceptics have and would continue to invent their evidence, and continue to quote one another as experts of choice. As frustrating as this is to those who see the truth, it is what we stand to defend, their right to express their ignorance. They are in fact not a minority, it is a uphill battle for people like yourself and I admire your perseverance, I however can't help feeling that humanity isn't worth the bother.

What a simple mind you have. I was what your refer to as a denier long before Brietbart or WUWT. I was even a denier when Al Gore and Ehrlich were hawking an oncoming Ice Age. You see, real scientists think for themselves. We don't rely on others to seek the truth for us. But it is nice that others substantiate what we have proven scientifically to be to ourselves. In other words, it is nice to see that there are other sane people out there.

Probably be stuck with the likes of those Rentseekers who shamed their profession as evidenced by the Climategate Email Scandal and attempted coverup.

JoNova.com is also an excellent source of honest/ethical science.

It reminds me of life before television.

We just had to sit there staring into the corner all night!

As long as we have free speech, and the internet someone will alert us to the ridiculous actions of beaurocrats and goverments,

I know you hate the fact, that your propaganda brainwashing programs are revealed for what they are.

I never read either so my various posts are answer enough.

They would stand around with their thumbs in their mouths.

just keep telling the truth

I mean, who would tell them what to think?

I do suppose there is junkscience that no longer gets paid by big tobacco.

But really, would they be at a loss for words?