Essentially, since they didn't really cause the problem in the first place (at least, for the most part), their only contribution to reducing global warming should be to reduce or eliminate their own new contributions *to* global warming. Reduce deforestation, put in clean energy rather than coal (particularly since many of them are excellently sited for solar power), set up mass transit for their cities rather than having everyone drive cars, implement things like terra preta soils if and when they do clear new farmland (which would also help improve the farmland), and so on.

GLOBAL WARMING IS NOT REAL! Global warming has been scientifically disproven. Global warming is also called Agenda 21 (think about that!). Global warming is a global agenda to bring about world wide communism. People must get ride of pollution producing cars, houses that use too much energy, etc. Eventually we will be expected to live in tiny apartments, keep only a days supply of food, hang our clothes out the windows, etc. I have even seen elementary school presentations where kids are shown images of "dream" villages with apodmnets, and no personal vehicles, little personal property; a place to be born, grow old, die, and perhaps never leave. Its frightening that people believe in this phony concept so easily.

They can contribute by staying poor. Billions of people do not use washing machines to do laundry. They should not consider doing so as that would lead to more CO2 emissions.

Rich countries built their infrastructure off of cheap energy. Poor countries should not be allowed to do the same according to the denizens of this site.

They should develop infrastructure based on new energy sources, rather than on old energy sources. Why do they have to burn oil and coal?

Are their planes biplanes?

Are their trains powered by steam locomotives?

When they get new computers, do these computers occupy an entire room?

So, no, they do not have to follow the same path as North America, Europe or Japan.

When building cities give public transport priority over private transport.

This question makes me wanna vom

by burning hydrocarbon fuels