> 10,000 people marched to fight so-called "global warming" in NYC yesterday. Yet we still have so-called "

10,000 people marched to fight so-called "global warming" in NYC yesterday. Yet we still have so-called "

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
The organizers got what they wanted. A lot of socialist conversions, free drugs and a lot of nookie. Global Warming and Climate Change are still alive and well in the minds of the ill informed and evil snake oil salesmen. This was just a warmup to make the Climate Change representatives who are about to embark on another worthless conference feel good about themselves as though they are really doing something useful.

That says something about their movement, when they have to rely on some garbage spouting trash leaving polluters to convince them that they are a useful life form rather that the worthless moneysucking leaches that they are.

Bunch of naive communist marching . They should go to Cuba to see how paradise is working . Chemicals everywhere.

North Korea stone age . China polluted air and rivers .

Yeah, it turns out that a march is only a single step, not a miracle cure.

See also the lack of a cure for cancer, despite all of the Breast Cancer walks.

I think they succeeded brilliantly! Between the protestors and the scientists and Al Gore who has been instrumental in "raising awareness" of the issue, it is clear we have managed to stop global warming. This is a great victory, and all those who participated should be richly rewareded.

Amazing isn't it! You posted your 1000th fake question here, yet some posters still accept the science you deny. Wonders never cease. Not that you have much use for or knowledge of facts, or that it has jack to do with climate science or policy anyway, but NYC's estimates were 300 thousand not 10 thousand.

U.S. National Academy of Sciences, 2010:

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record...

“Climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for a broad range of human and natural systems.”

http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpine...

“Choices made now about carbon dioxide emissions reductions will affect climate change impacts experienced not just over the next few decades but also in coming centuries and millennia…Because CO2 in the atmosphere is long lived, it can effectively lock the Earth and future generations into a range of impacts, some of which could become very severe.”

“The Academy membership is composed of approximately 2,100 members and 380 foreign associates, of whom nearly 200 have won Nobel Prizes.

Members and foreign associates of the Academy are elected in recognition of their distinguished and continuing achievements in original research; election to the Academy is considered one of the highest honors that can be accorded a scientist or engineer.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warm...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_...

http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/...

http://nas-sites.org/americasclimatechoi...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Revie...

http://nas-sites.org/climate-change/qand...

http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument...



Over 300,000,000 stayed away! LOL! I guess most people didn't want to show their hypocrisy.

It was probably considered a success. 0.1% of the population showed up.

I guess that skeptics/deniers are doing their job well (as they should) and the alarmists are looking for another "poster child".

We sent 3000 people into Africa to fight Ebola in spite of the fact that there are worse diseases and bigger threats. Some people just aren't very good at identifying threats. I call those people alarmists.

nobody's buying the climate warming BS

Deniers have been lying about AGW for years and still not learned that their beliefs - not matter how profoundly stupid and uninformed - do not change the physics that define and control the universe.

=====

Stubby Phillips ---

Since it takes some intelligence and knowledge to make a joke, you can take that option off the table.

They produces too much CO2

Why did they fail to accomplish their goal? Was it because there weren't enough marchers? Would 50,000 marchers have been better able to end so-called "global warming"? Did they fail to care enough? Why do you think the marchers failed to end so-called "global warming"?

It would have changed if 100,000 TROLLS showed up.

You're either joking or just don't get it

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-1-...

it was to make a statement. Another asinine question.

MORON