They are politicians and scaremongers seeking power and money.
Fraudulent? Yes they are.
Manufactured ‘Science’: Another IPCC Scientist Reveals How UN Scientists talked about ‘trying to make IPCC report so dramatic that US would just have to sign Kyoto Protocol’
http://www.climatedepot.com/2010/01/26/M...
Pachauri was wrong, 5587 times wrong, because that’s the number of non-peer-reviewed or “grey-literature” citations in the IPCC’s 2007 assessment report—30 per cent of all citations, as journalist Donna Laframboise discovered.[4] The grey-literature included press releases from Greenpeace and Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF), not to mention a “first version of a draft”. The science team even used grey-literature in preference to unwelcome peer-reviewed findings. As George Filippo, a 2002–08 IPCC vice-chair of Group 1 (science), put it in a Climategate e-mail in 2000:
http://www.quadrant.org.au/magazine/issu...
-----------------------
No.
Does a bear defecate in the woods?
No, but Monckton is.
No, but your source certainly is
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/20/monckton-challenges-the-ipcc-suggests-fraud-and-gets-a-response/
