Just remember you opened this door, so straight back to quoting C3, not even a brief rest from the pseudo science then. What is their proof a graph with unreadable text, wow.
You are right, if you put your faith in a nonsense blog like C3, as I think I have mentioned to you before, of coarse a small problem to that could be that water vapor has in fact increased.
https://www-pls.llnl.gov/?url=science_an...
I can't wait to see the excuses you will try on this one, I'd start with giving me the usual 5-6 thumbs down, like I care about that at all, or perhaps a rant about Al Gore, it seems you say you don't deny the science yet you take on faith a graph you can't even read, classic.
<<..from NOAA via C3...>>
Again you have this weird habit of getting data via a middleman. Why?
C3headlines, run by an anonymous person whose expertise is completely unknown, makes a few graphs which he/she claims are based on 'official data' and not one 'skeptic' bothers to check.
It's real 24/7 skeptics who do that and over and over again they find them to be doctored (*) in such a way that they do not reflect the data they pretend to be based on.
In your 2nd graph (the first being too small to be able to see it), the 'trick' is that C3 has cherry-picked a starting date at 1998 (an abnormally hot year) and thus it gives a downward trend.
And again 'fake skeptics' swallow it all, no questions asked. Their eagerness for the C3 produced graphs to be true thus confirming that 'gut' feeling they've had all along, that eagerness blinds them completely from being a real skeptic and questioning all the data they come across.
<<...how about this one then..>>
A 'Friends of Science' produced graph, are you serious?
http://deepclimate.org/2009/07/16/friend...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friends_of_...
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?tit...
Well your link goes to a stand alone graph with no legend. The warmer the troposphere gets, the more water will evaporate. A great deal of weather happens as water vapor collects at the Himalayas. This travels over the mountains as cool air. It then warms resulting in Monsoons in India,and can effect storms and severe weather thousands miles away. Obviously there is much more to this. If you get a chance, watch the series "The Planet Earth"
Just what change in the climate are you referring to? For instance, if a climate became more desert like it would become warmer and dryer. Since the term 'Climate Change' has no definitive set of circumstances, one cannot answer this objectively.
Antarctic: It is obvious that C3 is a better source of information than the rags that you get your information. Remember, NASA used to be run by a person who is now a full time communist activist. But you believe that trash just because it fits your agenda. Ha! Ha! Nice try but your ignorance is showing.
Big Gryph has no clue!
Water will vaporize higher in a warming troposphere and will fall from a higher point as "rain", but the planet maintains its own "equilibrium". People do not have much influence on our climate!
There's no evidence that rain is falling from a higher level!
Gotta love "antarcticice"! He brings his own lawnmower for his own hair cut!
From his link : https://www-pls.llnl.gov/?url=science_an...
“When ***you*** heat the planet, ***you*** increase the ability of the atmosphere to hold moisture,” said Benjamin Santer, lead author from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s Program for Climate Modeling and Intercomparison. “The atmosphere’s water vapor content has increased by about 0.41 kilograms per square meter (kg/m2) per decade since 1988, and natural variability in climate just can’t explain this moisture change. The most ***plausible*** explanation is that it’s due to the human-caused increase in greenhouse gases.”
My question to "antarcticice" is : "Who is ***you*** and what is ***plausible***?" This statement starts as an accusation as if it was directed towards "facts" that humans **cause** the planet to warm.
P.S. I added the *.
P.S.S. We should ask Benjamin Santer what a normal atmospheric moisture content is under a "Natural Climate Variability" situation and what it should look like at this point in time and in this day and age and also how he came to such a conclusion.
Definitely, climate change will increase atmospheric water vapor because climate changes due to increase in various gaseous in atmosphere, these various gaseous absorb water vapor in atmosphere.
I know, this is real science, but? http://c3headlines.typepad.com/.a/6a010536b58035970c0147e2fc6895970b-350wi doesn't look like much of an increase to me.
I keep being told that climate science, the laws of thermodynamics, make me a stupid skeptic.
Of course I don't deny the science, but something must be missing, because where is the empirical evidence.
