That's not a consensus view. Very few scientists believe that global warming will make Earth colder in the long term. I'm sure there are a few scientists who hold that view.
If the temperature drops at night somewhere on the globe then there can be no "so-called global warming."
Just as there can be no home run champs if one of them strikes out once.
Don't you see why Jello has more BAs than you? He is a 'True Scientist.'
One or two degrees of warming would be hard for most of us to notice never mind identify, however the energy required to raise the temperature an average of one degree will and does effect the climate in any number of ways.
The term 'Global Warming' includes EVERYTHING -- EVERYWHERE -- ALL THE TIME. That's why its not a valid theory. It's just a political mantra.
-----------------------
Yes, especially for tall white guys.
Quote by Steven Guilbeault, Canadian environmental journalist and Greenpeace member: "Global warming can mean colder, it can mean drier, it can mean wetter."
You see you and your bevy of dunces don't even know the question, let alone the answer.
He's just lying, as usual. If he were honest he'd leave his questions open for everyone to answer.
if so it's only because it's unusually hot elsewhere and that's causing more erratic weather.
yeps, cuz i hafta turn up my air conitioner
jello says, "The consensus of scientists have peer reviewed papers stating that the planet will get much colder because of the current warming trend."
Where might that idea have come from?
Is there anything published that supports it?
Jello says, "The truth about a consensus is that a consensus is a political, not scientific conclusion."
Does the audience of the consensus make any difference in the outcome?
EG, if it was a consensus among:
- politicians?
- republicans?
- democrats?
- scientists?
- climate scientists?
- scientists that are paid by the Koch brothers?
no. the planet is warming.
why pay attention to jello?
