The theory of the Big Lie was succinctly expounded by Adolf Hitler, an acknowledged master of the genre. Here is what Der Führer wrote in vol. I, Chapter 10 of Mein Kampf (in James Murphy' translation):
"...in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying."
It is an old formula, used by many evil people. The greenies aren't even original. They have to act like Hitler.
The scientific opinion on climate change is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and it is extremely likely (at least 95% probability) that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels. In addition, it is likely that some potential further greenhouse gas warming has been offset by increased aerosols.This scientific consensus is expressed in synthesis reports, by scientific bodies of national or international standing, and by surveys of opinion among climate scientists. Individual scientists, universities, and laboratories contribute to the overall scientific opinion via their peer-reviewed publications, and the areas of collective agreement and relative certainty are summarised in these high level reports and surveys.
National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed current scientific opinion on climate change. These assessments are generally consistent with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summarized:
It's easy for people to dismiss things like climate change when they have no idea what evidence-based science is. Take some college level physical science classes folks.
I would be interested to see the peer-reviewed scientific study where this prediction was made. I am unable to find it in Google Scholar, so I assume it wasn't a scientific prediction.
oh the tender confusion of the conservative know-it all
more warming = more evaporation = more rain and snow fall
Climate is not a day-to-day measurement. It's a long term trend.
It's like saying that the ice caps can't be melting because it's -40 today.
If you look hard enough thru all of the historical records that are available, you can find some period when the weather exactly fits your pre-determined model.
In the end one way or another the world will be come uninhabitable whether it be 1000 years or 1.5 billion years we are all screwed in the end
Yeah, "climate experts" pushing forward "climate change" are loonies. It's all a bunch of bs.
Any links documenting actual statements of such "experts"?
I live in So. Wi. and THEY said the Great Lakes were going dry. All 5 Great Lakes are above average.
Does Obama & Co. pay THESE people to try to make us feel sad?
IT'S NOT WORKING OBIE
Reality proves them wrong all the time
Said who?
Global warming is real.
I believe you are lying as you always do
