Well.... If you follow the current growth curve for Eb0ola infection rates, then we will have a population of 0 at the 2 year mark with Ebola.

Of course there will be many events and actions that will attenuate and like drop this curve to zero.

this being said Ebola is FAR more dangerous than Global Warming.

Ebola

Ebola

Ebola

Ebola

Ebola,because we can reduce Global warming but treatment of Ebola is not found yet.Ebola is killing the people rapidly than Global warming.

None of the above, I believe Ebola will be contained and Global Warming won't happen anytime soon.

Neither. Ebola os actualy a virus that does not have the capacity to really cause massive problem in first world countries. The need of the virus to spread via bodily fluids makes contracting the virus less likely. Further, while most hospitals do not have the necessary means of avoiding the spread of the virus as their standard procedures, they certianly have the capabilities to do so in the US. Even now, those precautions are being implemented with teh few cases we have seen in the US.

AS for AGW, it is being exagerrated so much that what comes out in the media does not even remotely resemble even teh climate scientists knowledge of AGW. And the cliamte scientists are already biased as shown in 95% of theiri mdoels overestimating the current warming.

Global Warming, Ebola trimming the population of world .mostly in south Africa where starvation and health problem are always main problem. But Global Warming sallow the whole earth in black hole .In gradually , human world die by Global warming.

Ebola is REAL and VERY dangerous. I just read a story today that one of the health care workers that helped Thomas Duncan has now tested positive for the virus. Duncan died last week. http://news.yahoo.com/state-health-offic...

There is absolutely nothing to fear from so called man-made Global Warming, it simply does not exist. Ebola however, is an entirely different matter. It is very contagious and deadly and I fear the threat is not being taken seriously enough by the government.

-----------------------

both of them but ebola is more dangerous than global warming but global warming create the many virus like ebola

Most of us will not die of either.

But, if I had to guess, over the next, say, 50 years, I'd suspect that there will be more deaths at least partially due to AGW than to Ebola.

Everybody dies and most do not exit by choice. What you can do is vote

to pass a law as I did to obtain death by legal M.D. prescription. If I have

a terminal health condition I can orally notify my M.D. of my legal rights.

I'll be told to make an appointment 15 days distant. When I see the M.D.

again, repeat my request for death, I will obtain the prescription. Once

same if prepared the date and place is mine to choose. Or, like you,

I can wait for Ebola and Global Warming. Oregon also has the Death

By Choice law. Non-Residents who ask to be served death are denied.

Neither, Global warming will take thousands of years to do anything major and Ebola isn't even air born so if we'd contain it in some way, we would all be fine..

Its not sure, if Ebola enter the country it is really a dangerous threat. we are really worry about it. Global warming has long time effects.

Global warming.

Global warming

Global warming.

ebola is real global warming is a lie

Neither, if you think ebola is going to wipe humanity maybe turn on the news channel

Global warming.

Neither. It will more likely be the Greenie Reptilian Invasion from the Hollow Moon, using Literacy, Education, Al Gore's time machine, and 4th Dimension Holographic Carbon Tax Death Ray. (Unless True Scientists, who are seen and whose long list of award and peer-reviewed publications is known and proven to exist -unless you think Obama has a birth certificate- pose the same 20 "questions" here per day, and give each other BAs).