You can't say 67% of scientists. It was 67% of scientists at this one conference who say it's greatly exaggerated. The conference may have been put on by "The Climate Change Skeptics Society of India".
Saying that though... I'm 100% certain that fears of man made global warming are EXTREMELY exaggerated.
I have never believed the over rated hype of man made global warming. I've seen sure things turn out to be way off based more than a few times in my life. The hype of man made global warming looks and smell like manure so you know what I think.
Climate change over geological time is a different thing from what's currently happening over a very short 'historical' time frame'. As far as 'greatly exaggerated' is concerned, maybe... but that doesn't mean there's no valid concern. Today we have close to eight billion people on this planet. Even a small shift in such things as growing seasons or monsoons will have massive effects on large populations. ALL of the data to date has indicated historically rapid changes in rainfall patterns and the length of summers and winters particularly in the northern hemisphere. At the current rate of CO2 accumulation and hence solar heat retention we'll be at 450ppm in less than 30 years. That's at the very least the foothills of a runaway greenhouse effect... and that would be a significantly bad thing for everyone.
100% of everybody knows that the backyard grill produces warming of the globe that wouldn't be there if everybody wasn't enjoying the hamburgers (even those of tofu). The question is whether this warrants banning fire.
Some say "we got computer models".
Some say "we know what GIGO means, besides didn't The Club of Rome say that too?".
Enjoy your burger (tofu or otherwise).
The earth was hotter 65 million years ago, before humans existed!
Therefore, AGW is wrong.
Florida has snow!
Therefore, AGW is wrong.
Seriously, is this the level of science the skeptics are using now?
I get it, 2 out of 3 is 67%.
<<
Why go all the way back then. You could just as easily ask why the glaciers melted 15 thousand years ago. I don't think that argument is going to change many alarmists.
Who cares what scientists say. As long as we're not all dead from it, let's live our lives like we're actually enjoying them, instead of being in constant fear. You people watch too much news and attend too many liberal educational institutions. Learn to create your own destiny instead of perpetually consuming someone else's progressivism.
67 percent? That will never sell. Call it 97 percent. (sarc)
They will never give up the political battle, regardless of logic to the contrary, and they have agents and officers at every level. Global Warming amounts to little more than ambulance chasing, and it will continue as long as sensational media encourages corrupt politicians and visa versa.
Any scientist who does not conform to the expected reality will be considered as discredited, wacko, industry-funded, etc.
Scientists are saying that "The Cretaceous period 65 million years ago was the hottest in the history of the earth. Man was not around at the time," and that fears of climate change amount to propaganda and "unnecessarily cause panic".
Do these statements sound reasonable to you, and do you agree with them?
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/environment/global-warming/fears-of-man-made-global-warming-exaggerated/articleshow/45786412.cms
But I thought that 97% of scientists stated that their cat preferred Whiskers to any other leading brand of cat food ?
yes
74.9807% of scientists affirm that statistical studies are useless and misleading.
PS: AGW is a fraud, plain & simple.
Actually, they don't. 99.9% of scientists say that it's much worse already than they had expected. Stop lying.
