It is not a solution for the problems. Now the northern latitude are colder than other places but it is not for all days. The problems due to global warming is high temperature in earth. But the environmental problems are nor global warming only. There can be earthquakes, floods etc. are climate changes. The main reason for the climate change is the bad activities of human. The northern latitude are not free from all environmental disasters. If the persons like you are thought like this the northern latitude become crowded area, so it also face the problems due to high population. The effects because of population also get increased in northern latitude.
No.
I have experienced the incredible warming over the last 30 years. I think I could stand it if we had the same increase again in the next 30 years.
Here is a thought. Where do most plants and animals live now? Do they live at the equator or the poles? Can it be true that the tropics are teaming with life and the poles are almost free of it? What does that say about where people, plants and animals prefer to live?
That sounds like a good plan. I think it would be wise to move now to beat the rush. This means a huge investment possibility in northern land. Buy all you can as fast as possible, 100s and 100s of acres. When things get too hot to bear there will be millions of people moving north and real estate prices will climb out of control. Buy now while it is still cheap.
Additional investment tip: Oceans are predicted to rise 80 feet. Land that is currently 82 feet above sea level will become prime beachfront property.
If you are too hot where you are now, consider moving. Otherwise, as Trevor and others point out, the changes from AGW affect many other things than average temps, are hard to predict on a local basis, and mostly involve slow changes in probabilities: the changes are significant globally, but not a good reason to move locally.
Its no longer called global warming but its "global climate change". What people don't realize is climate change is natural. Everyone says the amount of carbon we release is bad. What they don't understand is that a single volcano eruption can release about 5 times as much carbon as humans have ever produced.
The funny thing is that all the stuff the "scientists" said will happen haven't happened yet. Example: they said that there would be a fast increase in hurricanes over the next few years. But the number of hurricanes have gone down. Now that they were accused of fabricating data, which was true, their new excuse is "its still going to happen, our models are right, but its just going to happen soon. Later than we expected." lol
Anyway, don't move. The earth always changes and we are about 1000 years due for a new ice age, so unless you want a change in scenery, don't move.
There can be a lot of confusion surrounding the effects of global warming, it’s not helped by the media who like to sensationalise things. As a result the effects of global warming can be exaggerated and lead to undue worry.
It’s extremely difficult to predict with any degree of accuracy how the climates are going to change in the future. Many different scenarios have been calculated and the most likely outcome appears to be that the average global temperature will rise by about 3°C by the end of the century.
On the time-scales you’re referring to this would be about a 1°C temperature rise.
To put this into perspective, a very rough rule of thumb is that for each 100 miles south you go the temperature increases by 1°C. So on these sorts of time-scales, there isn’t going to be a huge difference between the present climate and the climate 20 to 30 years hence.
The other thing of course, different people like different types of climate. Some may prefer the warmer temperatures of the future, but for others they may be uncomfortable.
And one other thing, we’ve already seen temperatures rises of about 1°C but because they happen slowly most people don’t notice them, this will be true of the future also.
Temperatures have been hot for the last decade or so, but I do not believe they will get hotter, I tend to think they will go back to being cooler, so you could end up living somewhere that's too cold for you.
Seeing that temps have only altered by 0.8C in the last century I wouldn't make a move on what the media is telling us, go to where you feel comfortable it's not likely to change much.
If you don't like your climate, whether it is too hot or too cold for you, it does indeed make sense to move to a climate more of your liking. Many denialists say that warmer is good. If they believe that, rather than driving some monster on which they spend more money on gas than on their mortgage and having accidents in their pants when the toilets back up in nuclear power plants, they should move to warmer climates.
Nope, it makes no sense to move because man-made Global Warming isn't happening.
We know this because it's advocates have no empirical science to back their claim. And their advocacy movement has been mired in scandal since its beginning. Here are some things you should know:
1) The Earth has been both much warmer and much colder in the distant past, long before the industrial age. Climate is indeed changing, but it has always changed and probably always will. These are obviously natural cycles that man does not and cannot control.
2) Global Warming alarmists have been caught in one lie after another. Huge scandals have been continuously revealed since the early 1980’s when the campaign began. Some of these are listed below:
3) Al Gore’s movie "An Inconvenient Truth" was full of bald faced lies. Like the Polar Bears were drowning, or the Ice Caps were melting, or the oceans were rising --- all lies. In fact a court of England ruled the movie was so flawed that it could not be shown to school children without a disclaimer.
4) The ClimateGate affair exposed the utter corruption of the Warmist community with their exposed emails speaking of how they intended to “hide the decline” and how to manipulate data and the peer-review process in their favor.
5) Then there is the fact that the globe isn’t even warming anymore and the small amount of warming experienced from the 1900’s to 2013 timeframe was negligible and well within the envelope of normal.
6) During this same period of marginal warming, scientists also noticed that other planets in our solar system were warming. What do these planets have in common ? --- the Sun.
7) Phil Jones, head of the Climatic Research Unit, the Guru and High Priest of Global Warming himself admitted there has been no statistically significant warming. If anyone on the planet would have been aware of statistically significant warming it would have been Phil Jones and he admitted there has been none. (Game Over)
8) Warmists like Al Gore refuse to engage in any formal debate on the issue. That’s because on the few occasions Warmist have debated openly, they lose, and they lose big. Lord Monckton utterly destroys them time and time again.
9) Al Gore and other Warmists have stated clearly that they want to make CO2 the object of a global tax. CO2 is the perfect object for their revenue purposes because you literally cannot live without making CO2, after all, we exhale it. And current science has shown clearly that there is no correlation between the planet’s mean temperature and the concentration of CO2 in the air. Demonizing CO2 is all about the tax dollars, and that’s all its about.
See the scam for what it is and don’t believe any of it.
Polar Bears are doing fine:
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/190805/2...
Phil Jones admits NO statistically significant warming
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/02/1...
35 major errors in Al Gore’s movie
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckt...
Court rules Al Gore’s movie unfit without disclaimer (11 major errors reviewed)
http://creation.com/al-gores-inconvenien...
Graphs showing that CO2 does NOT drive Temperature
http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/...
Warming on Mars -- and Jupiter, Pluto, Neptune
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?ne...
Lord Monckton destroys Warmist in debate (Video)
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andre...
For the full story on the man-made Global Warming scam watch these:
The Great Global Warming Swindle
If you have a choice, where you're going to live for the next 20 or 30 years, possibly longer, does it make sense to choose a more northern latitude with a cooler climate, on the theory that it will be a better climate than south in the future, even if it's presently not quite as good, because it's colder?
It's called GLOBAL warming for a reason moving isnt going to help you
Move to New York. It snowed there in abundant amounts last Memorial day weekend.
Get reasonable. A .7 degree rise in temperature in 350 years, according to the 1990 IPCC report, does not mean anything uncomfortable. If you can't adapt to that then you are going to need a whole heap of CO2 generated power to keep you there.
Will your food still be grown on the Earth?
Since you only care about yourself and no one else certainly, but it really only prolongs the agony eventually the consequences of your action will catch up with you
