> Do only socialists accept that CO2 is a heat-trapping gas?

Do only socialists accept that CO2 is a heat-trapping gas?

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
Seems that I'm a PCT. Oh well. But I think I'm in good company ...

http://www.rkm.com.au/ANIMATIONS/carbon-... <== here's the physics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warm...

"The finding that the climate has warmed in recent decades and that human activities are already contributing adversely to global climate change has been endorsed by every national science academy that has issued a statement on climate change, including the science academies of ALL OF THE MAJOR INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_...

"With the release of the revised statement by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists in 2007, no remaining scientific body of national or international standing is known to reject the basic findings of human influence on recent climate change."

IE, NO REPUTABLE SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATION NOW CLAIMS THAT AGW IS NOT REAL.

No. Only people who accept reality accept that carbon dioxide is a heat trapping gas.

Global warming is happening

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010...

And we are causing it

http://c1planetsavecom.wpengine.netdna-c...

The ten warmest years in the instrumental record are 2010, 2005, 2009, 2007, 2002, 1998, 2006, 2003, 2013 and 2012.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs...

GC


<1. It can catch "infra red photons" and turn them into molecular vibration.

<2. It can turn molecular vibration into "infra red photons".



1 can catch photons from all directions, but most come from the ground. The photons from the Sun are mostly visible, UV and near IR photons which carbon dioxide does not absorb.

2 sends photons in all directions, including to the ground.

2 only happens when the carbon dioxide doesn't give up its vibrational energy by colliding with another molecule.

Both 1 and 2 cause carbon dioxide molecules to recoil from the momentum of the photon, adding to translational motion as well. This is why emitted photons are lower energy than absorbed photons.

He doesn't sound very smart to me, I am a global warming skeptic, but would never say statements like that.

I personally like to discuss the science, and try to leave politics and religion out of it.

That's what big oil and other polluting corporations want you to believe, remember cigarettes don't contribute to getting cancer, at all and if you say they do you should live in an ice hole in Siberia. Your Uncle got brainwashed by propaganda.

no

but anti-science fascists think co2 doesn't trap heat

CO2 has two major roles.

1. It can catch "infra red photons" and turn them into molecular vibration.

2. It can turn molecular vibration into "infra red photons".

The belief is that 1. causes warming and 2. causes cooling.

no.. mother nature does not care.

My uncle, whom our family thinks is a smart man, made the following statements the other day. He said that if you....

...agree that CO2 traps heat, you're a socialist.

...agree that Man is the biggest source of CO2 increase, you're a Marxist.

...accept that more CO2 in the atmosphere means more trapped heat, you're a Pinko Commie Traitor (PCT).

Is my uncle truly a smart man or is he missing something?