> Arguments against global warming? What do scientists say?

Arguments against global warming? What do scientists say?

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
None deny the greenhouse effect. A few, such as Roy Spencer and Richard Lindzen, say that the effect on temperature of man made carbon dioxide is small.

Heat energy moves from hot to cold. Put a steel pipe in a fire. Hold it in your hand. The tip will heat up rapidly, but eventually the heat will rise up to where you're holding it and your hand will burn. The atmosphere transfers heat energy in the same way. In this case the heat energy moves from the atmosphere to ocean water and ice. Sea water, because there's a lot of it heats slowly, and ice as it absorbs the heat energy slowly melts. This is why people can say there's 'no global warming' because the atmosphere isn't much warmer than it was in 1800 when CO2 concentration was about 286ppm. Today it's close to 400ppm; ALL of the increase is associated with the burning of fossil fuels.

The more CO2 the more heat will be retained by the atmosphere, but it doesn't stay in the atmosphere. So the question isn't where is the added heat in the atmosphere, the question is where all the heat went. Basically it's not the 'heat', but it's the results of that added heat that proves the case. The ice IS melting and gradual changes all along the artic coasts prove the point.

Conclusion: There is very little 'global warming' of the atmosphere, but you can't extrapolate that to conclude that there's no 'global warming' because the heat energy doesn't stay in the atmosphere. It's the effect that counts.

In the last 17 years there has been no statistically significant warming according to the head of the UK met office climate research unit. This despite the acceleration of global carbon emissions. The actual figure is 0.06C (six hundredths of a degree). The climate models predicted 0.3C rise for this period, that's five times what actually happened. To quote Richard Feynmam the Famous physicist . ' If the numbers don't support your theory, It is wrong, no matter how many support it, or how powerful and influential the are, it is still wrong.

Your answers are here.

Top climate scientists say there is no man-made Global Warming.

The Great Global Warming Swindle



Its very simple. There is no global warming. People think that increases in heat come from co2 however co2 increases came from an increase in heat. Its a natural sun-earth cycle.

There have been 13,950 peer reviewed articles on climate change between 1991 and 2012. Only 24 reject global warming.

there are a lot of different scientists, the ones that deny global warming tend to be the ones who do not research climate. would you go to a foot doctor for a heart transplant?

Read, The deniers. By Lawrence Salomon.

There are many more who have certifiably came out and denounced AGW than have proclaimed their support. That is a fact.

Quote by James Spann, American Meteorological Society-certified meteorologist: "Billions of dollars of grant money [over $50 billion] are flowing into the pockets of those on the man-made global warming bandwagon. No man-made global warming, the money dries up. This is big money, make no mistake about it. Always follow the money trail and it tells a story."

Quote by Tom McElmurry, meteorologist, former tornado forecaster in Severe Weather Service: “Governmental officials are currently casting trillions down huge rat hole to solve a problem which doesn’t exist....Packs of rats wait in that [rat] hole to reap trillions coming down it to fill advocates pockets....The money we are about to spend on drastically reducing carbon dioxide will line the pockets of the environmentalists....some politicians are standing in line to fill their pockets with kick back money for large grants to the environmental experts....In case you haven’t noticed, it is an expanding profit-making industry, growing in proportion to the horror warnings by government officials and former vice-presidents.”

Quote by Claude Culross, organic chemistry: “Dire predictions of catastrophe from that bottomless pit of disasters du jour, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, are based solely on computer models that amount to poorly crafted mathematical opinions, not experimental proof....There is no proof that man-made carbon dioxide causes additional warming, or that carbon-dioxide reduction would reduce warming.”

Quote by Will Happer, Princeton University physicist, former Director of Energy Research at the Department of Energy: “I had the privilege of being fired by Al Gore, since I refused to go along with his alarmism....I have spent a long research career studying physics that is closely related to the greenhouse effect....Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science. The earth's climate is changing now, as it always has. There is no evidence that the changes differ in any qualitative way from those of the past.”

These are intelligent people who make no money for fighting against the AGW theory. There are many many more.

Plus the earth is cooling right now and yet CO2 is going up. Makes no sense to think that CO2 is the driver of the temperature. That is true science. The earth is going against what these AGW alarmists have to say. Which one will you believe?

that i's true there is global warming

HAARP IN Alaska

97% of all scientists in the universe have found that there is absolutely NO catastrophic, man-caused, global warming.....NONE!

say whalla