As you know, Gore is not a scientist. No climate scientist has ever considered Gore to be a source of scientific information or ideas. Nor does Gore consider himself a scientist or someone that scientists would reference in their research. Gore has never falsely presented himself as being a scientist or of knowing more about science than do scientists - and that, alone, makes him more honest, rational, thoughtful, and informed than 99% of the world's Deniers.

====

OM --

>>I've looked at Gore's lifestyle for a source of some of my conclusions.>>

You're kidding. right? All evidence points to the fact that Newton was a fckinig as-hol. Should we judge his science based on his personality?

Since Gore is basically an orator and not a scientist, I doubt if there has been much more than citing the "An Inconvenient Truth" itself, but not as scientific data of course.

The movie did indeed wake a lot of people up to the need to protect our planet. It was flawed, but I think it was a good thing. A real scientist would be quoting empirical data to prove his/her hypothesis and only a total moron would quote Gore in a scientific paper.

Here is one that list Al Gore in the title. George Bush vs. Al Gore, 1994: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art... not sure if he is listed in the sources.

That is the only one I can find in the first few pages of my search. Most of the links on Google Scholar are books or articles.

here is another one where he is listed in the title but not in the references.

http://pages.uoregon.edu/gdjaco/Gore.pdf

He quotes scientific conclusions and not information by climate scientists. I can see why many people believe him because he is a politician, but that's also why they don't believe him. Why don't peer reviewed scientists disclaim him? Why is he the spokesman for "Global Warming"? I'm thinking he screws the message up just because he is a politician and not a climate scientist. He should be aborted from trying to send the message. He really does not understand the science. That's why he doesn't debate it. One of you guys ought to take his place.

Probably never

To the denier industry , this no citing will be view as a deliberate omission to deceive and therefore proof of a global conspiracy

I've looked at Gore's lifestyle for a source of some of my conclusions.

Never, but right wing denialist idiots, and can't help bringing him up, it's politics for them and science gets ignored

Probably never.