> DO global warming deniers support the gelatinous technique of LYING, BLOCKING and DELETING?

DO global warming deniers support the gelatinous technique of LYING, BLOCKING and DELETING?

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
I've had 2 answers deleted over the past week or so, answers reported by 'one or more trusted members'. Rrrright.

Rather than ask a question, it seems some of them are just here to spread as much anti-science propaganda as possible. Jello with his weird and often contradictory claims (for which he provides no back-up whatsoever) and Kano with links to denier sites (often without even trying to formulate a question at all). And lets not forget Sage who copy-pastes his own and others' questions ad infinitum. Like the other two, he is not interested in answers; he just wants to spread disinformation.

Edit: added info

I just checked some previous answers of mine and came across the following question which illustrates science denier behavior in this YA Section: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index...

Note how my short answer gets 8 thumbs down while Ottawa Mike's, who says he actually agrees with me, gets just one.So it's clear that many thumb down answers not because of the answer itself but because of who gives the answer.

PS Science deniers: I give a rats' *** about being thumbed down. I just think it illustrates your immature, non-scientific behavior.

Woo! GELATINOUS! Very impressive. Let me see. Ten whole letters. I bet your Kindergarteners are impressed also. Unfortunately, the word has no application in the sense that you use it. But I bet it fooled you whole class. Ha! Ha! Another bad day with your nylons I see!

Now getting to your question. If you are referring to me as a 'denier' I don't lie. Jesus identified the originator of the lie as Satan and I don't emulate him. I leave that to the greenies. They are more experienced at that and it has been proven that it is their main tool in the subjecting innocent people to their evil agenda. Blocking is something I don't do either. I know that my friend MAXX does this at times, but he is clear as to why. And if you apologize for your misbehavior he will unblock you. All you have to do is 'man up' and apologize. I guess for you it would be 'school marm up'. Now as to the Deleting, I don't know what you mean. If you mean vaporize by reporting and having Y!A delete it, I simply do not have the power since I was informed by Y!A itself that I was not a 'trusted' member. I am the record holder for having questions and answers vaporized, I had sixteen in a one day period. That had to come from some greenie booster at Y!A headquarters, which shows that Y!A is in the tank for greenies. Ha! Ha! To me I was impressed that I, little ole Sagebrush, rankled some feathers. I was impressed that a little old farm boy from South Dakota could get highly established greenies ire. Ha! Ha! And only by telling the truth as I see it. Here is the latest one of my answers that was vaporized, "GWP is as fictitious and abstract as the bogyman. Nobody, and I mean nobody, has come up with proven values for these factors yet. Sounds good in theory. Sounds good in a grade school classroom. Sounds good at pot smoking parties but we have yet to establish the science needed to give a true prescription." It seems that I hit home a little too hard. Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! I wonder which point it was? Just shows, the truth does hurt!

But I see the newest ploy of the greenies, and that is to change CATEGORIES. And I noticed that Dr. Jello has been ambushed this way also. Ha! Ha! You greenies sit up all night trying to think of devious ways to frustrate honest and true scientists and only come up with school yard playground techniques. Ha! Ha!

Yes. Many do. They are not hear to learn. Lets be real clear: people who seek truth and who are interested in gaining understanding are not climate change deniers. They remain deniers only because they do not want information.

The guy who's got your goat, Jello, is just a ranting troll.

***********************

Here is the link I gave to Kano when he asked for NOAA reports of snow cover.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/snow-and-ice/sn...

It is from the NOAA site and it is titled "United States Snow Cover (September 30, 2014) It is a map of all the U.S. covered in snow.

He ask for something, I find it for him. Answered his question. And for that I'm a "cheat".

Perhaps he meant to say, "Thank you."

Or perhaps clicking a link was too complicated. Here is the actual picture.



I only block people who block me and I've had my share of answers deleted for hurting the feelings of alarmists so join the club.

No definitely not, very occasionally I have reported some questions, spam and overly abusive posts.

I have always endeavored to be honest, yes I have made errors but have admitted them, when pointed out to me, I try to avoid misleading misinformation, a habit common among warmers, of course sometimes I am biased, but then I am only human.

I only cherry pick in retaliation to other cherry pickers.

Edit.

Here is a very recent example of misleading information BACCHEUS show a graph of sea ice extent and calls it snow cover, he is a CHEAT.

Edit

This is the image he showed

https://s.yimg.com/hd/answers/i/1a0a194e...

https://ca.answers.yahoo.com/activity?sh...

Edit

Now we have Jeff M twisting words, saying I wrongly stated october would be a record snow cover, I said COULD I didn't know as although I had heard reports of early snowfall in Asia, I had no way of checking with NOAA being down.

Nope. And, I highly object to this scurrilous type of question. This is like asking about people using the "N-word."

Yes, most of the people do.

That's all they do

no that would be your side, and the dogs are still growling. I know, I accept your apology

Most of them do. The ones who deceive, rather than the deceived.

yrs. many of them do. including reporting legitimate answers.

no