In order to find the climate sensitivity, they have to create models of the paleoclimate data, which uses many mroe variable than just CO2. In order to get the current temperature and temps from up to 100 years ago, they have to use geosaptial and time-spatial models. From these inputs they create models of the climate with MANY variables which are projected out into the future making various assumptions as to what the future holds.
So we have models of models of models. The uncertainty compounds and the uncertainty of the climate sensitivity found from the surrogate data like tree ring data is already high.
One thing she has sort of right is that the models do not line up. The paleoclimate models have only fair agreement between the surrogates used (i.e. tree ring versus ice core). They have less agreement between the surrogate data and the temperature records.
bal warming is calculated purely on CO2 levels recorded by machines that don't line up with any other source but we still use it coz it proves global warming. Oh and of course they use temperatures from decades because that also looks like warming when temperatures in fact are variable and slowly increase over all over 100,000 yrs so 10s of years is nothing.
Went to university to do a double masters in environmental science and environmental engine
All mathematical models are wrong, some mathematical models are useful.
What you describe demonstrates an utter lack of understanding of the fundamentals of science. I suggest you save time and use a Ouija board. Your conclusions will be every bit as valuable.
If you were really interested, you would know that amy is full of it, she has no idea of what climate change models involve. You would also know that earth's climate is a highly complex system so there is NO single factor that could possibly provide a useful model.
global warming is calculated purely on CO2 levels recorded by machines that don't line up with any other source but we still use it coz it proves global warming. Oh and of course they use temperatures from decades because that also looks like warming when temperatures in fact are variable and slowly increase over all over 100,000 yrs so 10s of years is nothing.
Went to university to do a double masters in environmental science and environmental engineering to cashing in considering it the highest paid science field yet the one that requires the least brains.
You can find information about aquiring climate model software by following this link.
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/tools/
Try Fantasyland!
you can try nasa the agency that faked the so called 'moon landings'
I'm told that there's a web site you can go to to see how the climate models predict the future. I would like to use the model to plot what the climate temperatures will be for the future, posting the results at 6 month intervals for the next 50 years. If the results are accurate, I plan on changing my position on so-called "global warming". So where can I go to plug in my own variables in this computer model?
