As long as the year or the month is in the top ten, we can not say that waming has stopped, as if it did stop, the first sign would be years and months which would be number 11.
Nevertheless, even if we do see some number 11s, if we do not see, some 12s, 13s, 14s, ect., Then an isolated number 11 would just be an outlier, as was 1998.
Pat
It's a good thing that I no longer use jyushchyshyn as my YA name. Tsk! Tsk! To anyone who uses their name.
This is true and nearly most of the literate world knows it. No one cares about it. There are so many summit have failed to solve this problem because of economy dominance and physical comfort. Scientist all over the world are warning the leaders of this world about ecological disturbance and green house effects. Be ready to face much more in near future if things will not change drastically. Big economy has to take some strong action.
People know that CO2 does not have a dramatic and overall negative effect on the climate in its current atmospheric concentrations.
We have morons like Jeff M, Climate Realist, pegminer, Hey Dook, Baccheus, antarcticice, etc... who can only wish to glorify their own ego with a 150 year temperature increase of 0.8C and holding and/or slightly falling. Their predictions of rising temperatures just need to be "puked" on and disregarded. Their evidence doesn't stand up in the court of science either. That's where public opinion is falling away from them also.
P.S. I have 4 incorrectly spelled words on the above posted answer. Can you name the morons who made up these words?
I would say worldwide temperatures have their ups and downs. Basing a long term trend on a single month, though, is just a little problematic don;t you think?
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/t2l...
a 0.13C drop which 0.17C above the thirty year average.
So how would you describe this? as the six highest July since UAH temps have been recorded, or a sign that the hiatus is continuing, or completely irrelevant.
