> Is it logical that anyone would trust 75 unnamed 'scientists' whose credentials are questionable over 31,000 cle

Is it logical that anyone would trust 75 unnamed 'scientists' whose credentials are questionable over 31,000 cle

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
Yes. If they are "unnamed" then how do you know their credentials are questionable?

LiberaIism is a mentaI disorder.

How about if it was the other way around.

Don't confuse quantity with quality.

Think back on all the major scientific discoveries throughout history.

You only really need one Scientist, so long as they are the right one.

Would you trust a Gynecologist to to do your Heart By-Pass surgery?

Just as logical when liberals refute forensic evidence and solely relies on eye witness testimony which is known to be inaccurate to fit their narrative to a story

Republicans would trust one man over an army of scientists

Their credentials are only 'questionable' because anyone not fully agreeing with the other AGW fascists have their credentials revoked. Hitler did the same sort of dishonest thing. You must be so proud to base your fear-mongering on flawed computer models.

How could you determine their credentials are questionable if they are unnamed? Did you verify and count the 31,000? Do you believe everything you read that agrees with your opinion?

The data on man made global warming was manipulated... the evidence is on the personal emails of many of the "respected" scientists involved with the predetermined conclusions.

Any computer model designed to measure temps that does NOT include scientific data from the sun is questionable ... at best.

Depends on which side is lieing.

Perfectly logical for Criminals...