It means you are using an ad hominem argument in an attempt to poison the well (discredit a particular individual).
It only shows that OM didn't know the "time" dawn started.
Does it matter? Only if the Ottawa Mike claimed there was a global cooling scare happening before his "dawn". ignoring the science published that showed global warming was likely. And compared to Kano who welcomes global warming as something great, Ottawa Mike seems to understand that there are negative consequences of dumping excessive amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere. I do agree that his posts don't always reflect that concern, but I labeling him as a cheerleader is debatable.
Not only is Kano being childish with his name calling, he is clearly lying when he states "Is this about Dork, well nobody takes any notice of him, he is a coward who blocks everyone." I take notice of Hey Dook, there is no evidence that Hey Dook is any more of a "coward" then any one else who posts here anonymously and Hey Dook does not block me.
In a single sentence, Kano lied twice, resorted to name calling once and made one accusation that would only be true if it were true for Kano himself. Quite impressive, considering he managed to do all this in only 18 words.
Which poster? Madd Maxx? Ottawa Maxx? Sagebrush? John Cena? Kano?
Or is Gangnam Style Rapper, Psy Gua, back?
I don't pay attention to questions from those who block others from reading or answering their questions. People who do that have no interest in the truth.
It says that one pointless question has multiplied into three.
Is this about Dork, well nobody who is open-minded takes any notice of him, he is a coward who blocks everyone who might oppose him.
Edit I am not really anonymous unlike most warmist's here, you can email me through YA, many do.
it says "you are bawdy ! "
Is this relevant to the case for global warming when a cheerleader bashes others when he himself can't understand basic questions?
