Global Warming was caused by an ALIEN Organism. We human's turned off Global Warming in 2012, confirmed by our Satelite reports 11/28/2012. Global Warming melted almost all the Glaciers and alot of ICED continents/ NOT a hoax, but real and no more. Mike
Well just look at what the greenies admit on the subject.
Quote by Jim Sibbison, environmental journalist, former public relations official for the Environmental Protection Agency: "We routinely wrote scare stories...Our press reports were more or less true...We were out to whip the public into a frenzy about the environment."
Quote by Ottmar Edenhoffer, high level UN-IPCC official: "We redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy...Basically it's a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization...One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore."
Quote by Club of Rome: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill....All these dangers are caused by human intervention....and thus the “real enemy, then, is humanity itself....believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realize world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is “a real one or….one invented for the purpose."
Quote by emeritus professor Daniel Botkin: "The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe."
Quote from Monika Kopacz, atmospheric scientist: "It is no secret that a lot of climate-change research is subject to opinion, that climate models sometimes disagree even on the signs of the future changes (e.g. drier vs. wetter future climate). The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians’ ― and readers’ ― attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today’s world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty."
Quote by Christine Stewart, former Canadian Environment Minister: “No matter if the science is all phoney, there are collateral environmental benefits.... climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
Quote by Timothy Wirth, U.S./UN functionary, former elected Democrat Senator: “We’ve got to ride the global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”
Quote by Richard Benedik, former U.S./UN bureaucrat: "A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect."
These are quotes for dyed in the wool GW activists. They even outwardly admit that it is a hoax.
Another aspect to ponder: If it truly is a scientific problem, then why is every solution a POLITICAL one? Here is their end game.
Quote from the UN's Own "Agenda 21": "Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level."
Quote by Maurice Strong, a billionaire elitist, primary power behind UN throne, and large CO2 producer: “Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?”
Quote by Gus Hall, former leader of the Communist Party USA: "Human society cannot basically stop the destruction of the environment under capitalism. Socialism is the only structure that makes it possible."
Even scientifically there is pure evidence that there is no global warming caused by CO2.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut...
You can clearly see that the Earth has been cooling for over a decade. Yet, during this same time period the CO2 level has risen. That should be proof enough for anyone to see that GW is a hoax.
AGW and CC are total fictions:
Quote by Chris Folland of UK Meteorological Office: “The data don't matter. We're not basing our recommendations [for reductions in carbon dioxide emissions] upon the data. We're basing them upon the climate models.”
Quote by David Frame, climate modeler, Oxford University: “Rather than seeing models as describing literal truth, we ought to see them as convenient fictions which try to provide something useful.”
When top scientists ignore data and accept fiction, don't you think everyone should realize it is a HOAX!?
If you are dealing with facts then you would prove global warming is NOT a hoax
Do not publish any thing to the effect that it is a hoax that you can't prove, or you could be sued for defamation.
Global Warming is happening bro, the only really debate is whether its natural, or natural warming being exacerbated by man. The only ones denying it is those at Fox News. Please share your reputable sources. I'd be interested.
You have enough "facts" to prove that global warming is a hoax?
What will your next project be?
The earth is flat.
The earth is the center of the universe?
The earth is 8,000 years old?
Maybe you want to consider:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warm...
"The finding that the climate has warmed in recent decades and that human activities are already contributing adversely to global climate change has been endorsed by every national science academy that has issued a statement on climate change, including the science academies of all of the major industrialized countries."
So you really think that the National Science Academies, of every single industrialized country, is lying.
Concerning your "research", you might consider what "Freinds of science" is, and who pays to have their data created and posted on the internet.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?tit...
In other words, they're another mouth-piece for the energy industry.
As such, reading what they post wouldn't be considered "research".
Ask an alarmist about how much the temperature has actually risen by adding 120ppm (1.2 parts in 10,000) of CO2 into the atmosphere and see if you ever get a straight answer.
They use temperature anomalies instead of actual temperature measurements and they always try and identify the beginning of the "Industrial Revolution" as a starting point of the warming. Most scientists know and understand that the earth has been coming out of the Little Ice Age since the mid-19th century. Of course it is warming. They also know that there have always been "abrupt" temperature shifts of up to 4C to 5C in either direction. The most recent up-tick in temperature that is most notable (1997-1998) was a purely natural event of an ocean temperature shift.
When they can actually measure the temperature increases caused by raised CO2 levels (as they were being paid to do in the first place), instead of making this a "politically-charged" environmental issue, then maybe they can raise some credibility issues and develop some trust. If it is still too complicated for 10,000 scientists to figure out in the 26 years of the IP CC, then maybe it's time to start defunding this money sinkhole.
The skeptics handbook
http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/sh1/the_s...
Careful, looks like you're going to make climate unrealist cry-- arh shame
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environ...
If you think that it is exaggerated, that there is no way the government would fudge the actual records, think again. They have done it over and over and over and over again and it always leads to increased warming. The adjustments never go in favor of cooling yet alarmists buy it over and over and over and over again. Some people are easily fooled.
i had to do something similar in college, find 3 facts supporting global warming, and find 3 facts showing global warming is false..
if i remember right, there were some articles i found saying that the world goes through "weather cycles", so its not global warming, we're just in the part of the cycle where its warmer... also there was some articles saying Mars is experiencing similar weather patters as Earth in regards to temperature rising, etc.. so that would show it may not be Human's involvement that is making temps increase.
I've probably got enough facts to do it but if there is any obscure or hidden facts that I don't know about please let me know.
good luck with that!
watch and learn
http://www.cosmosontv.com/watch/27080352...
