If someone with your predilection to believe utter nonsense does not accept AGW, then there is absolutely no point in anyone engaging in debate with you. Nothing I say will convince you that AGW is happening because you have made up your mind on the issue. Not on the basis of scientific knowledge, a sound understanding of the principles involved, or a careful analysis of the available literature, but on what you think you know and what you believed from dubious sites of questionable scientific credibility you stumbled across on the internet.
Sagebrush –
>>. It was directed by James Hansen, who when it was proven he corrupted data,which can never be recovered<<
If it is proven then you should have no problem identifying it.
Of course, you cannot provide that information because you are a liar.
>>even though Dork routinely gets away with it<<
I believe that I call people idiots just as frequently as Hey Dook.
>>In fact while I am at it I will call his answers Quantum stupid. <<
“Quantum Stupidity is the technical term for the mental condition of people who apparently hold the belief that using word "quantum" as an adjective in any sentence somehow makes the idea that the sentence is expressing sound more intelligent in some way. (possibly at a quantum level)”
http://en.illogicopedia.org/wiki/Quantum...
Making yourself look more stupid than the person you are calling stupid sort of defeats the whole purpose of the intended insult – don’t you think?
I already answered a question about bureaucrats earlier today, just like the asker of that question I realize you are just having some fun and I won't bother to repeat at least part of my answer here.
Instead let me add to the hilarity by pointing out that by using Sagebrush's own "logic", he is losing the argument. Ten month ago he stated "The first sign of a person who is losing an argument is that they start name calling." [1] now he states "Here we have an example of Dork, who is a true idiot, calling someone else an idiot."
Define "differential equation" and provide three examples of how they are used (showing all mathematical steps) so that we can find out once and for all if you are an idiot savant or just plain mentally disturbed, or extremely crappy at trying to be ironic.
The myth that the moon landings were a "hoax" was invented by one nutcase in America years ago and has been regurgitated millions of times since, around the world. There is zero substance to it.
I agree with your assessment. Information is always taken out of context in order to fit our individual view of how the World works.
The United Nations and anything connected to it has a view of a one-world Government but it seems that many people will conform simply to have a paycheck.
We have been to the moon. I don't know where you get the idea that we haven't.
The moon landing was debunked decades ago. Neil Armstrong shot JFK and in an attempt to cover up his actions the CIA created the moon landing hoax. Their thinking was that no one would believe an American hero could have shot the President of the United States.
@Hey Doofus... Pretty sure this "question" was a sarcastic rebuttal to mine. Seriously do you not know any Jewish people?
If you think that the Apollo program is a liberal lie, you're beyond reason.
I think people on both sides of the political spectrum have a distrust of government bureaucrats. I don't believe there is a UN conspiracy to make people live in hobbit homes or to take away everyone's guns, but I do believe that non elected government *** kissers are mainly looking out for their own best interests. The mandate of the NASA is to "explore space for the benefit of Mankind".
You have a non elected body consisting of overpaid bureaucrats who's liberal goal is to basically convince us of the liberal lie that Man has been to the Moon. Imagine if you had a UN group of Round-Earthers whose mandate was to assess whether or not the Earth is flat. What do you think most of their reports would conclude?
