> Just when exactly did abuse become a valid argument ?

Just when exactly did abuse become a valid argument ?

Posted at: 2015-03-12 
Did I miss a meeting ?

Which part of abuse are you referring to exactly? Are you referring to your comment about 'parroting an idiot'? Or maybe it was when you were insinuating 'Rob' is stupid? You may not have missed the meeting. You may have just forgot you attended.

Jeff nailed this one, I guess it might be better to ask why those who generate much of the abuse keep asking about abuse, I guess if you have no science to reference then abuse is your alternative, a few groundless rants about Gore or Greens or Communists ask jim he's an 'egg-spurt'

I guess a real skeptic might also ask why claims like "we are going to sue Gore and we are backed by 30,000 scientist's" which deniers still reference yet it, yet 5 years later nothing at all happened about this hollow rant, this sort of nonsense would suggest nobody is 'going to the meetings' but sadly there are few real skeptics in the denier camp.

In the modern era, Lee Atwater followed by Karl Rove, Rush, Hannity, and lesser members of the Gang of Right-Wing Political Nitwits.

Yes you did :( the meeting was last week. Keep up Pindar!:p

Abuse is used when people feel they are losing the argument, it is a sure sign that your winning.

Did I miss a meeting ?